From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [bug report] sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:46:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201113084657.GA86197@mwanda> (raw)
Hello Vincent Guittot,
The patch b4c9c9f15649: "sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric
wakeup path" from Oct 29, 2020, leads to the following static checker
warning:
kernel/sched/fair.c:6249 select_idle_sibling()
error: uninitialized symbol 'task_util'.
kernel/sched/fair.c
6233 static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
6234 {
6235 struct sched_domain *sd;
6236 unsigned long task_util;
6237 int i, recent_used_cpu;
6238
6239 /*
6240 * On asymmetric system, update task utilization because we will check
6241 * that the task fits with cpu's capacity.
6242 */
The original comment was a bit more clear... Perhaps "On asymmetric
system[s], [record the] task utilization because we will check that the
task [can be done within] the cpu's capacity."
6243 if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_asym_cpucapacity)) {
6244 sync_entity_load_avg(&p->se);
6245 task_util = uclamp_task_util(p);
6246 }
"task_util" is not initialized on the else path.
6247
6248 if ((available_idle_cpu(target) || sched_idle_cpu(target)) &&
6249 asym_fits_capacity(task_util, target))
^^^^^^^^^
Uninitialized variable warning.
6250 return target;
6251
6252 /*
6253 * If the previous CPU is cache affine and idle, don't be stupid:
6254 */
6255 if (prev != target && cpus_share_cache(prev, target) &&
6256 (available_idle_cpu(prev) || sched_idle_cpu(prev)) &&
6257 asym_fits_capacity(task_util, prev))
6258 return prev;
6259
6260 /*
6261 * Allow a per-cpu kthread to stack with the wakee if the
regards,
dan carpenter
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-13 8:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-13 8:46 Dan Carpenter [this message]
2020-11-13 8:56 ` [bug report] sched/fair: Prefer prev cpu in asymmetric wakeup path Vincent Guittot
2020-11-13 11:49 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201113084657.GA86197@mwanda \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).