From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: "Nathan Chancellor" <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
"Michael Ellerman" <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@kernel.org>,
"Brian Cain" <bcain@codeaurora.org>,
"Fāng-ruì Sòng" <maskray@google.com>,
"kernel test robot" <lkp@intel.com>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Subject: Re: Error: invalid switch -me200
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:20:37 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201114002037.GW2672@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdkBSGPaKmQY1nERVe4_n19Q=MUtuwdond=FJAAF9N9Zhg@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:14:18PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > > Error: invalid switch -me200
> > > > Error: unrecognized option -me200
> > >
> > > 251 cpu-as-$(CONFIG_E200) += -Wa,-me200
> > >
> > > Are those all broken configs, or is Kconfig messed up such that
> > > randconfig can select these when it should not?
> >
> > Hmmm, looks like this flag does not exist in mainline binutils? There is
> > a thread in 2010 about this that Segher commented on:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/9859E645-954D-4D07-8003-FFCD2391AB6E@kernel.crashing.org/
> >
> > Guess this config should be eliminated?
The help text for this config options says that e200 is used in 55xx,
and there *is* an -me5500 GAS flag (which probably does this same
thing, too). But is any of this tested, or useful, or wanted?
Maybe Christophe knows, cc:ed.
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-14 0:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-13 3:21 Error: invalid switch -me200 kernel test robot
2020-11-13 17:28 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2020-11-13 19:08 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-11-13 19:42 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-13 20:04 ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-11-13 20:14 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-11-14 0:20 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2020-11-14 0:37 ` Fāng-ruì Sòng
2020-11-14 0:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-11-16 20:27 ` Scott Wood
2020-11-16 20:47 ` Segher Boessenkool
2020-11-16 23:59 ` Alan Modra
2020-11-14 9:02 ` Christophe Leroy
2020-11-16 6:06 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-11-16 15:26 ` Christophe Leroy
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-02 8:48 kernel test robot
2020-07-29 16:50 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201114002037.GW2672@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=bcain@codeaurora.org \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox