From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, jianxin.pan@amlogic.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, khilman@baylibre.com,
narmstrong@baylibre.com, jbrunet@baylibre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dwmac-meson: use picoseconds for the RGMII RX delay
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 23:32:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201114223250.GI1480543@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201114200104.4148283-2-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 09:01:01PM +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Amlogic Meson G12A, G12B and SM1 SoCs have a more advanced RGMII RX
> delay register which allows picoseconds precision. Deprecate the old
> "amlogic,rx-delay-ns" in favour of a new "amlogic,rgmii-rx-delay-ps"
> property.
>
> For older SoCs the only known supported values were 0ns and 2ns. The new
> SoCs have 200ps precision and support RGMII RX delays between 0ps and
> 3000ps.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/net/amlogic,meson-dwmac.yaml | 52 ++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/amlogic,meson-dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/amlogic,meson-dwmac.yaml
> index 6b057b117aa0..bafde1194193 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/amlogic,meson-dwmac.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/amlogic,meson-dwmac.yaml
> @@ -74,18 +74,68 @@ allOf:
> Any configuration is ignored when the phy-mode is set to "rmii".
>
> amlogic,rx-delay-ns:
> + deprecated: true
> enum:
> - 0
> - 2
> default: 0
> + description:
> + The internal RGMII RX clock delay in nanoseconds. Deprecated, use
> + amlogic,rgmii-rx-delay-ps instead.
> +
> + amlogic,rgmii-rx-delay-ps:
> + default: 0
> description:
> The internal RGMII RX clock delay (provided by this IP block) in
> - nanoseconds. When phy-mode is set to "rgmii" then the RX delay
> + picoseconds. When phy-mode is set to "rgmii" then the RX delay
> should be explicitly configured. When the phy-mode is set to
> either "rgmii-id" or "rgmii-rxid" the RX clock delay is already
> provided by the PHY. Any configuration is ignored when the
> phy-mode is set to "rmii".
Hi Martin
I don't think the wording matches what the driver is actually doing:
if (dwmac->rx_delay_ns == 2)
rx_dly_config = PRG_ETH0_ADJ_ENABLE | PRG_ETH0_ADJ_SETUP;
else
rx_dly_config = 0;
switch (dwmac->phy_mode) {
case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII:
delay_config = tx_dly_config | rx_dly_config;
break;
case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_RXID:
delay_config = tx_dly_config;
break;
case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_TXID:
delay_config = rx_dly_config;
break;
case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID:
case PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII:
delay_config = 0;
break;
So rx_delay is used for both rgmii and rgmii-txid. The binding says
nothing about rgmii-txid.
And while i'm looking at the code, i wonder about this:
if (rx_dly_config & PRG_ETH0_ADJ_ENABLE) {
if (!dwmac->timing_adj_clk) {
dev_err(dwmac->dev,
"The timing-adjustment clock is mandatory for the RX delay re-timing\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
/* The timing adjustment logic is driven by a separate clock */
ret = meson8b_devm_clk_prepare_enable(dwmac,
dwmac->timing_adj_clk);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dwmac->dev,
"Failed to enable the timing-adjustment clock\n");
return ret;
}
}
It looks like it can be that rx_dly_config & PRG_ETH0_ADJ_ENABLE is
true, so the clock is enabled, but delay_config does not contain
rx_delay_config, so it is pointless turning it on.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-14 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-14 20:01 [PATCH RFC v1 0/4] dwmac-meson8b: picosecond precision RX delay support Martin Blumenstingl
2020-11-14 20:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/4] dt-bindings: net: dwmac-meson: use picoseconds for the RGMII RX delay Martin Blumenstingl
2020-11-14 22:32 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2020-11-15 9:22 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2020-11-15 15:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-11-14 20:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/4] net: stmmac: dwmac-meson8b: " Martin Blumenstingl
2020-11-14 20:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/4] net: stmmac: dwmac-meson8b: move RGMII delays into a separate function Martin Blumenstingl
2020-11-14 20:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 4/4] net: stmmac: dwmac-meson8b: add support for the RGMII RX delay on G12A Martin Blumenstingl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201114223250.GI1480543@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
--cc=jianxin.pan@amlogic.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox