linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com>,
	Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Vineeth Pillai <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@gmail.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, kerrnel@google.com,
	Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	vineeth@bitbyteword.org, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
	Agata Gruza <agata.gruza@intel.com>,
	Antonio Gomez Iglesias <antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com>,
	graf@amazon.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, dfaggioli@suse.com,
	pjt@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, derkling@google.com,
	benbjiang@tencent.com, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
	OWeisse@umich.edu, Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@oracle.com>,
	Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
	jsbarnes@google.com, chris.hyser@oracle.com,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 -tip 13/26] kernel/entry: Add support for core-wide protection of kernel-mode
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:50:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201116145037.GA3042983@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52d4b334-e399-1e61-5ef5-ec24be1b23ce@oracle.com>

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 11:08:25AM +0100, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
[..]
> > > >    static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
> > > >    					    unsigned long ti_work)
> > > >    {
> > > > @@ -175,7 +198,7 @@ static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
> > > >    		 * enabled above.
> > > >    		 */
> > > >    		local_irq_disable_exit_to_user();
> > > > -		ti_work = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
> > > > +		ti_work = exit_to_user_get_work();
> > > >    	}
> > > 
> > > What happen if the task is scheduled out in exit_to_user_mode_loop? (e.g. if it has
> > > _TIF_NEED_RESCHED set). It will have call sched_core_unsafe_enter() and force siblings
> > > to wait for it. So shouldn't sched_core_unsafe_exit() be called when the task is
> > > scheduled out? (because it won't run anymore) And sched_core_unsafe_enter() when
> > > the task is scheduled back in?
> > 
> > No, when the task is scheduled out, it will in kernel mode on the task being
> > scheduled in. That task (being scheduled-in) would have already done a
> > sched_core_unsafe_enter(). When that task returns to user made, it will do a
> > sched_core_unsafe_exit(). When all tasks goto sleep, the last task that
> > enters the idle loop will do a sched_core_unsafe_exit(). Just to note: the
> > "unsafe kernel context" is per-CPU and not per-task. Does that answer your
> > question?
> 
> Ok, I think I get it: it works because when a task is scheduled out then the
> scheduler will schedule in a new tagged task (because we have core scheduling).
> So that new task should be accounted for core-wide protection the same way as
> the previous one.

Exactly!

> > > Shouldn't we be using smp_store_release() like sched_core_unsafe_exit() does?
> > > 
> > > In any case, it is worth having a comment why WRITE_ONCE() or smp_store_release() is
> > > used.
> > 
> > The smp_store_release() in exit() ensures that the write to the nesting
> > counter happens *after* all prior reads and write accesses done by this CPU
> > are seen by the spinning CPU doing the smp_load_acquire() before that
> > spinning CPU returns. I did put a comment there.
> > 
> > But, I think I don't need smp_store_release() at all here. The spin_unlock
> > that follows already has the required release semantics. I will demote it to
> > a WRITE_ONCE() in enter() as well, and add appropriate comments.
> > 
> 
> I think a WRITE_ONCE() is not even be useful here. The WRITE_ONCE() will only prevent
> some possible compiler optimization in the function wrt rq->core->core_unsafe_nest, but
> rq->core->core_unsafe_nest is just updated here, and concurrent changes are protected
> by the rq_lockp(rq) spinlock, and the memory barrier is ensured by raw_spin_unlock().
> 
> So I thing you can just do:  rq->core->core_unsafe_nest++;
> 
> And in sched_core_unsafe_exit(), you can just do:  rq->core->core_unsafe_nest = nest - 1

Hmm, I believe KCSAN will flag this as data-race though. Even though the
variable is modified under lock, it is still locklessly read in
wait_till_safe(). Though I agree that in practice it may not be that useful
because we are only checking if the variable is > 0. If its Ok with you, I
will leave it as WRITE_ONCE for now.

> Also comment in sched_core_wait_till_safe() wrt smp_load_acquire() should be updated,
> it should say:
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Wait till the core of this HT is not in an unsafe state.
> 	 *
> 	 * Pair with raw_spin_unlock(rq_lockp(rq) in sched_core_unsafe_enter/exit()
> 	 */

Ah right, fixed. Thanks.

> > Can I add your Reviewed-by tag to below updated patch? Thanks for review!
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>

Will add, thanks!

 - Joel

> 
> > 
> > ---8<---
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > index bd1a5b87a5e2..a36f08d74e09 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> > @@ -4678,6 +4678,15 @@
> >   	sbni=		[NET] Granch SBNI12 leased line adapter
> > +	sched_core_protect_kernel=
> > +			[SCHED_CORE] Pause SMT siblings of a core running in
> > +			user mode, if at least one of the siblings of the core
> > +			is running in kernel mode. This is to guarantee that
> > +			kernel data is not leaked to tasks which are not trusted
> > +			by the kernel. A value of 0 disables protection, 1
> > +			enables protection. The default is 1. Note that protection
> > +			depends on the arch defining the _TIF_UNSAFE_RET flag.
> > +
> >   	sched_debug	[KNL] Enables verbose scheduler debug messages.
> >   	schedstats=	[KNL,X86] Enable or disable scheduled statistics.
> > diff --git a/include/linux/entry-common.h b/include/linux/entry-common.h
> > index 474f29638d2c..62278c5b3b5f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/entry-common.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/entry-common.h
> > @@ -33,6 +33,10 @@
> >   # define _TIF_PATCH_PENDING		(0)
> >   #endif
> > +#ifndef _TIF_UNSAFE_RET
> > +# define _TIF_UNSAFE_RET		(0)
> > +#endif
> > +
> >   #ifndef _TIF_UPROBE
> >   # define _TIF_UPROBE			(0)
> >   #endif
> > @@ -69,7 +73,7 @@
> >   #define EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK						\
> >   	(_TIF_SIGPENDING | _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME | _TIF_UPROBE |		\
> > -	 _TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_PATCH_PENDING |			\
> > +	 _TIF_NEED_RESCHED | _TIF_PATCH_PENDING | _TIF_UNSAFE_RET |	\
> >   	 ARCH_EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK)
> >   /**
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index d38e904dd603..fe6f225bfbf9 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -2071,4 +2071,16 @@ int sched_trace_rq_nr_running(struct rq *rq);
> >   const struct cpumask *sched_trace_rd_span(struct root_domain *rd);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> > +void sched_core_unsafe_enter(void);
> > +void sched_core_unsafe_exit(void);
> > +bool sched_core_wait_till_safe(unsigned long ti_check);
> > +bool sched_core_kernel_protected(void);
> > +#else
> > +#define sched_core_unsafe_enter(ignore) do { } while (0)
> > +#define sched_core_unsafe_exit(ignore) do { } while (0)
> > +#define sched_core_wait_till_safe(ignore) do { } while (0)
> > +#define sched_core_kernel_protected(ignore) do { } while (0)
> > +#endif
> > +
> >   #endif
> > diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
> > index 2b8366693d5c..d5d88e735d55 100644
> > --- a/kernel/entry/common.c
> > +++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
> > @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ static __always_inline void enter_from_user_mode(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >   	instrumentation_begin();
> >   	trace_hardirqs_off_finish();
> > +	if (_TIF_UNSAFE_RET) /* Kernel protection depends on arch defining the flag. */
> > +		sched_core_unsafe_enter();
> >   	instrumentation_end();
> >   }
> > @@ -137,6 +139,27 @@ static __always_inline void exit_to_user_mode(void)
> >   /* Workaround to allow gradual conversion of architecture code */
> >   void __weak arch_do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs) { }
> > +static unsigned long exit_to_user_get_work(void)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long ti_work = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
> > +
> > +	if ((IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SCHED_CORE) && !sched_core_kernel_protected())
> > +	    || !_TIF_UNSAFE_RET)
> > +		return ti_work;
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> > +	ti_work &= EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK;
> > +	if ((ti_work & _TIF_UNSAFE_RET) == ti_work) {
> > +		sched_core_unsafe_exit();
> > +		if (sched_core_wait_till_safe(EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK)) {
> > +			sched_core_unsafe_enter(); /* not exiting to user yet. */
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> >   static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
> >   					    unsigned long ti_work)
> >   {
> > @@ -174,7 +197,7 @@ static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
> >   		 * enabled above.
> >   		 */
> >   		local_irq_disable_exit_to_user();
> > -		ti_work = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
> > +		ti_work = exit_to_user_get_work();
> >   	}
> >   	/* Return the latest work state for arch_exit_to_user_mode() */
> > @@ -183,9 +206,10 @@ static unsigned long exit_to_user_mode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs,
> >   static void exit_to_user_mode_prepare(struct pt_regs *regs)
> >   {
> > -	unsigned long ti_work = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags);
> > +	unsigned long ti_work;
> >   	lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> > +	ti_work = exit_to_user_get_work();
> >   	if (unlikely(ti_work & EXIT_TO_USER_MODE_WORK))
> >   		ti_work = exit_to_user_mode_loop(regs, ti_work);
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index fa68941998e3..429f9b8ca38e 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -76,6 +76,27 @@ __read_mostly int scheduler_running;
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(sched_core_protect_kernel);
> > +static int __init set_sched_core_protect_kernel(char *str)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long val = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (!str)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	if (!kstrtoul(str, 0, &val) && !val)
> > +		static_branch_disable(&sched_core_protect_kernel);
> > +
> > +	return 1;
> > +}
> > +__setup("sched_core_protect_kernel=", set_sched_core_protect_kernel);
> > +
> > +/* Is the kernel protected by core scheduling? */
> > +bool sched_core_kernel_protected(void)
> > +{
> > +	return static_branch_likely(&sched_core_protect_kernel);
> > +}
> > +
> >   DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(__sched_core_enabled);
> >   /* kernel prio, less is more */
> > @@ -4596,6 +4617,226 @@ static inline bool cookie_match(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b)
> >   	return a->core_cookie == b->core_cookie;
> >   }
> > +/*
> > + * Handler to attempt to enter kernel. It does nothing because the exit to
> > + * usermode or guest mode will do the actual work (of waiting if needed).
> > + */
> > +static void sched_core_irq_work(struct irq_work *work)
> > +{
> > +	return;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void init_sched_core_irq_work(struct rq *rq)
> > +{
> > +	init_irq_work(&rq->core_irq_work, sched_core_irq_work);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * sched_core_wait_till_safe - Pause the caller's hyperthread until the core
> > + * exits the core-wide unsafe state. Obviously the CPU calling this function
> > + * should not be responsible for the core being in the core-wide unsafe state
> > + * otherwise it will deadlock.
> > + *
> > + * @ti_check: We spin here with IRQ enabled and preempt disabled. Break out of
> > + *            the loop if TIF flags are set and notify caller about it.
> > + *
> > + * IRQs should be disabled.
> > + */
> > +bool sched_core_wait_till_safe(unsigned long ti_check)
> > +{
> > +	bool restart = false;
> > +	struct rq *rq;
> > +	int cpu;
> > +
> > +	/* We clear the thread flag only at the end, so no need to check for it. */
> > +	ti_check &= ~_TIF_UNSAFE_RET;
> > +
> > +	cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > +	rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> > +
> > +	if (!sched_core_enabled(rq))
> > +		goto ret;
> > +
> > +	/* Down grade to allow interrupts to prevent stop_machine lockups.. */
> > +	preempt_disable();
> > +	local_irq_enable();
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Wait till the core of this HT is not in an unsafe state.
> > +	 *
> > +	 * Pair with smp_store_release() in sched_core_unsafe_exit().
> > +	 */
> > +	while (smp_load_acquire(&rq->core->core_unsafe_nest) > 0) {
> > +		cpu_relax();
> > +		if (READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags) & ti_check) {
> > +			restart = true;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Upgrade it back to the expectations of entry code. */
> > +	local_irq_disable();
> > +	preempt_enable();
> > +
> > +ret:
> > +	if (!restart)
> > +		clear_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_UNSAFE_RET);
> > +
> > +	return restart;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Enter the core-wide IRQ state. Sibling will be paused if it is running
> > + * 'untrusted' code, until sched_core_unsafe_exit() is called. Every attempt to
> > + * avoid sending useless IPIs is made. Must be called only from hard IRQ
> > + * context.
> > + */
> > +void sched_core_unsafe_enter(void)
> > +{
> > +	const struct cpumask *smt_mask;
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +	struct rq *rq;
> > +	int i, cpu;
> > +
> > +	if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_core_protect_kernel))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	local_irq_save(flags);
> > +	cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > +	rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> > +	if (!sched_core_enabled(rq))
> > +		goto ret;
> > +
> > +	/* Ensure that on return to user/guest, we check whether to wait. */
> > +	if (current->core_cookie)
> > +		set_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_UNSAFE_RET);
> > +
> > +	/* Count unsafe_enter() calls received without unsafe_exit() on this CPU. */
> > +	rq->core_this_unsafe_nest++;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Should not nest: enter() should only pair with exit(). Both are done
> > +	 * during the first entry into kernel and the last exit from kernel.
> > +	 * Nested kernel entries (such as nested interrupts) will only trigger
> > +	 * enter() and exit() on the outer most kernel entry and exit.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->core_this_unsafe_nest != 1))
> > +		goto ret;
> > +
> > +	raw_spin_lock(rq_lockp(rq));
> > +	smt_mask = cpu_smt_mask(cpu);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Contribute this CPU's unsafe_enter() to the core-wide unsafe_enter()
> > +	 * count.  The raw_spin_unlock() release semantics pairs with the nest
> > +	 * counter's smp_load_acquire() in sched_core_wait_till_safe().
> > +	 */
> > +	WRITE_ONCE(rq->core->core_unsafe_nest, rq->core->core_unsafe_nest + 1);
> > +
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->core->core_unsafe_nest == UINT_MAX))
> > +		goto unlock;
> > +
> > +	if (irq_work_is_busy(&rq->core_irq_work)) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Do nothing more since we are in an IPI sent from another
> > +		 * sibling to enforce safety. That sibling would have sent IPIs
> > +		 * to all of the HTs.
> > +		 */
> > +		goto unlock;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * If we are not the first ones on the core to enter core-wide unsafe
> > +	 * state, do nothing.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (rq->core->core_unsafe_nest > 1)
> > +		goto unlock;
> > +
> > +	/* Do nothing more if the core is not tagged. */
> > +	if (!rq->core->core_cookie)
> > +		goto unlock;
> > +
> > +	for_each_cpu(i, smt_mask) {
> > +		struct rq *srq = cpu_rq(i);
> > +
> > +		if (i == cpu || cpu_is_offline(i))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		if (!srq->curr->mm || is_task_rq_idle(srq->curr))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		/* Skip if HT is not running a tagged task. */
> > +		if (!srq->curr->core_cookie && !srq->core_pick)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Force sibling into the kernel by IPI. If work was already
> > +		 * pending, no new IPIs are sent. This is Ok since the receiver
> > +		 * would already be in the kernel, or on its way to it.
> > +		 */
> > +		irq_work_queue_on(&srq->core_irq_work, i);
> > +	}
> > +unlock:
> > +	raw_spin_unlock(rq_lockp(rq));
> > +ret:
> > +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Process any work need for either exiting the core-wide unsafe state, or for
> > + * waiting on this hyperthread if the core is still in this state.
> > + *
> > + * @idle: Are we called from the idle loop?
> > + */
> > +void sched_core_unsafe_exit(void)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned long flags;
> > +	unsigned int nest;
> > +	struct rq *rq;
> > +	int cpu;
> > +
> > +	if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_core_protect_kernel))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	local_irq_save(flags);
> > +	cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > +	rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> > +
> > +	/* Do nothing if core-sched disabled. */
> > +	if (!sched_core_enabled(rq))
> > +		goto ret;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Can happen when a process is forked and the first return to user
> > +	 * mode is a syscall exit. Either way, there's nothing to do.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (rq->core_this_unsafe_nest == 0)
> > +		goto ret;
> > +
> > +	rq->core_this_unsafe_nest--;
> > +
> > +	/* enter() should be paired with exit() only. */
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->core_this_unsafe_nest != 0))
> > +		goto ret;
> > +
> > +	raw_spin_lock(rq_lockp(rq));
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Core-wide nesting counter can never be 0 because we are
> > +	 * still in it on this CPU.
> > +	 */
> > +	nest = rq->core->core_unsafe_nest;
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!nest);
> > +
> > +	WRITE_ONCE(rq->core->core_unsafe_nest, nest - 1);
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The raw_spin_unlock release semantics pairs with the nest counter's
> > +	 * smp_load_acquire() in sched_core_wait_till_safe().
> > +	 */
> > +	raw_spin_unlock(rq_lockp(rq));
> > +ret:
> > +	local_irq_restore(flags);
> > +}
> > +
> >   // XXX fairness/fwd progress conditions
> >   /*
> >    * Returns
> > @@ -4991,6 +5232,7 @@ static inline void sched_core_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
> >   			rq = cpu_rq(i);
> >   			if (rq->core && rq->core == rq)
> >   				core_rq = rq;
> > +			init_sched_core_irq_work(rq);
> >   		}
> >   		if (!core_rq)
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > index 001382bc67f9..20937a5b6272 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > @@ -1061,6 +1061,8 @@ struct rq {
> >   	unsigned int		core_enabled;
> >   	unsigned int		core_sched_seq;
> >   	struct rb_root		core_tree;
> > +	struct irq_work		core_irq_work; /* To force HT into kernel */
> > +	unsigned int		core_this_unsafe_nest;
> >   	/* shared state */
> >   	unsigned int		core_task_seq;
> > @@ -1068,6 +1070,7 @@ struct rq {
> >   	unsigned long		core_cookie;
> >   	unsigned char		core_forceidle;
> >   	unsigned int		core_forceidle_seq;
> > +	unsigned int		core_unsafe_nest;
> >   #endif
> >   };
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-16 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-20  1:43 [PATCH v8 -tip 00/26] Core scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 01/26] sched: Wrap rq::lock access Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 02/26] sched: Introduce sched_class::pick_task() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-22  7:59   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-10-22 15:25     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-23  5:25       ` Li, Aubrey
2020-10-23 21:47         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-24  2:48           ` Li, Aubrey
2020-10-24 11:10             ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-10-24 12:27               ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-10-24 23:48                 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-10-26  9:01                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-27  3:17                   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-10-27 14:19                   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-27 15:23                     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-27 14:14                 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 03/26] sched: Core-wide rq->lock Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-26 11:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-27 16:27     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 04/26] sched/fair: Add a few assertions Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 05/26] sched: Basic tracking of matching tasks Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 06/26] sched: Add core wide task selection and scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-23 13:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 13:54     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 17:57       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-23 19:26         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 21:31           ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-26  8:28             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-27 16:58               ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-26  9:31             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-05 18:50               ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-05 22:07                 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-23 15:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-23 17:59     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 07/26] sched/fair: Fix forced idle sibling starvation corner case Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 08/26] sched/fair: Snapshot the min_vruntime of CPUs on force idle Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-26 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-28 15:29     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-28 18:39     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-29 16:59     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-29 18:24     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-29 18:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-30  2:36         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-30  2:42           ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-30  8:41             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-10-31 21:41               ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 09/26] sched: Trivial forced-newidle balancer Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 10/26] sched: migration changes for core scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 11/26] irq_work: Cleanup Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 12/26] arch/x86: Add a new TIF flag for untrusted tasks Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 13/26] kernel/entry: Add support for core-wide protection of kernel-mode Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  3:41   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-03  0:20     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-22  5:48   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-03  0:50     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-30 10:29   ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-03  1:20     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-06 16:57       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-06 17:43         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-06 18:07           ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-10  9:35       ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-10 22:42         ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-16 10:08           ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-11-16 14:50             ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2020-11-16 15:43               ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 14/26] entry/idle: Enter and exit kernel protection during idle entry and exit Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 15/26] entry/kvm: Protect the kernel when entering from guest Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 16/26] sched: cgroup tagging interface for core scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 17/26] sched: Split the cookie and setup per-task cookie on fork Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-04 22:30   ` chris hyser
2020-11-05 14:49     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-09 23:30     ` chris hyser
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 18/26] sched: Add a per-thread core scheduling interface Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 19/26] sched: Add a second-level tag for nested CGroup usecase Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-31  0:42   ` Josh Don
2020-11-03  2:54     ` Joel Fernandes
     [not found]   ` <6c07e70d-52f2-69ff-e1fa-690cd2c97f3d@linux.intel.com>
2020-11-05 15:52     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 20/26] sched: Release references to the per-task cookie on exit Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-04 21:50   ` chris hyser
2020-11-05 15:46     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 21/26] sched: Handle task addition to CGroup Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 22/26] sched/debug: Add CGroup node for printing group cookie if SCHED_DEBUG Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 23/26] kselftest: Add tests for core-sched interface Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-30 22:20   ` [PATCH] sched: Change all 4 space tabs to actual tabs John B. Wyatt IV
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 24/26] sched: Move core-scheduler interfacing code to a new file Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-26  1:05   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-03  2:58     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 25/26] Documentation: Add core scheduling documentation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-20  3:36   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-12 16:11     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-10-20  1:43 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 26/26] sched: Debug bits Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-10-30 13:26 ` [PATCH v8 -tip 00/26] Core scheduling Ning, Hongyu
2020-11-06  2:58   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-06 17:54     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-09  6:04       ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-06 20:55 ` [RFT for v9] (Was Re: [PATCH v8 -tip 00/26] Core scheduling) Joel Fernandes
2020-11-13  9:22   ` Ning, Hongyu
2020-11-13 10:01     ` Ning, Hongyu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201116145037.GA3042983@google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=OWeisse@umich.edu \
    --cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
    --cc=agata.gruza@intel.com \
    --cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
    --cc=antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com \
    --cc=aubrey.intel@gmail.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benbjiang@tencent.com \
    --cc=chris.hyser@oracle.com \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=derkling@google.com \
    --cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
    --cc=dhaval.giani@oracle.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=graf@amazon.com \
    --cc=jdesfossez@digitalocean.com \
    --cc=jsbarnes@google.com \
    --cc=junaids@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kerrnel@google.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=naravamudan@digitalocean.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
    --cc=viremana@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).