From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rcu/segcblist: Add debug checks for segment lengths
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:52:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201119035222.GA18458@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201118201335.GR1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:13:35PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:15:41AM -0500, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > After rcu_do_batch(), add a check for whether the seglen counts went to
> > zero if the list was indeed empty.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
>
> Queued for testing and further review, thank you!
FYI, the second of the two checks triggered in all four one-hour runs of
TREE01, all four one-hour runs of TREE04, and one of the four one-hour
runs of TREE07. This one:
WARN_ON_ONCE(count != 0 && rcu_segcblist_n_segment_cbs(&rdp->cblist) == 0);
That is, there are callbacks in the list, but the sum of the segment
counts is nevertheless zero. The ->nocb_lock is held.
Thoughts?
Thanx, Paul
> > ---
> > v1->v2: Added more debug checks.
> >
> > kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> > kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h | 3 +++
> > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 ++
> > 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
> > index 5059b6102afe..6e98bb3804f0 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.c
> > @@ -94,6 +94,18 @@ static long rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, int seg)
> > return READ_ONCE(rsclp->seglen[seg]);
> > }
> >
> > +/* Return number of callbacks in segmented callback list by totalling seglen. */
> > +long rcu_segcblist_n_segment_cbs(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp)
> > +{
> > + long len = 0;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = RCU_DONE_TAIL; i < RCU_CBLIST_NSEGS; i++)
> > + len += rcu_segcblist_get_seglen(rsclp, i);
> > +
> > + return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* Set the length of a segment of the rcu_segcblist structure. */
> > static void rcu_segcblist_set_seglen(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp, int seg, long v)
> > {
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h
> > index cd35c9faaf51..46a42d77f7e1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/rcu_segcblist.h
> > @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ static inline long rcu_cblist_n_cbs(struct rcu_cblist *rclp)
> > return READ_ONCE(rclp->len);
> > }
> >
> > +/* Return number of callbacks in segmented callback list by totalling seglen. */
> > +long rcu_segcblist_n_segment_cbs(struct rcu_segcblist *rsclp);
> > +
> > void rcu_cblist_init(struct rcu_cblist *rclp);
> > void rcu_cblist_enqueue(struct rcu_cblist *rclp, struct rcu_head *rhp);
> > void rcu_cblist_flush_enqueue(struct rcu_cblist *drclp,
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index f5b61e10f1de..91e35b521e51 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -2553,6 +2553,8 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(count == 0 && !rcu_segcblist_empty(&rdp->cblist));
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU) &&
> > count != 0 && rcu_segcblist_empty(&rdp->cblist));
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(count == 0 && rcu_segcblist_n_segment_cbs(&rdp->cblist) != 0);
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(count != 0 && rcu_segcblist_n_segment_cbs(&rdp->cblist) == 0);
> >
> > rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
> >
> > --
> > 2.29.2.299.gdc1121823c-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-19 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-18 16:15 [PATCH v2] rcu/segcblist: Add debug checks for segment lengths Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-18 20:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-19 3:52 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2020-11-19 3:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-19 18:32 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-19 19:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-19 19:44 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-19 20:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-19 20:42 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-01 22:26 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-02 4:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-02 14:58 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-02 15:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201119035222.GA18458@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox