public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
To: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org,
	"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Lee Jones" <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"David Jander" <david@protonic.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pwm: pca9685: Switch to atomic API
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 11:00:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201119100005.GA703@workstation.tuxnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGngYiV+oDeagaCfpeACMzQyDHVzk9ERbSBjW_fW5hoQANHqog@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Sven,

thank you for your fast response and helpful feedback! I'll answer below.

On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 07:18:04PM -0500, Sven Van Asbroeck wrote:
> Hi Clemens, thank you so much for this contribution.
> I no longer have access to this chip, so I cannot test
> the changes.
> 
> Some friendly/constructive feedback below.
> 
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 12:44 PM Clemens Gruber
> <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com> wrote:
> >
> > This switch to the atomic API goes hand in hand with a few fixes to
> > previously experienced issues:
> > - The duty cycle is no longer lost after disable/enable (previously the
> >   OFF registers were cleared in disable and the user was required to
> >   call config to restore the duty cycle settings)
> > - The prescale register is now read out. If one sets a period resulting
> >   in the same prescale register value, the sleep and write to the
> >   register is skipped
> >
> > The hardware readout may return slightly different values than those
> > that were set in apply due to the limited range of possible prescale and
> > counter register values. If one channel is reconfigured with new duty
> > cycle and period, the others will keep the same relative duty cycle to
> > period ratio as they had before, even though the per-chip / global
> > frequency changed. (The PCA9685 has only one prescaler!)
> >
> > Note that although the datasheet mentions 200 Hz as default frequency
> > when using the internal 25 MHz oscillator, the calculated period from
> > the default prescaler register setting of 30 is 5079040ns.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c | 233 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  1 file changed, 124 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > index 4a55dc18656c..20f1314e6754 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-pca9685.c
> > @@ -51,7 +51,6 @@
> >  #define PCA9685_PRESCALE_MAX   0xFF    /* => min. frequency of 24 Hz */
> >
> >  #define PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE  4096
> > -#define PCA9685_DEFAULT_PERIOD 5000000 /* Default period_ns = 1/200 Hz */
> >  #define PCA9685_OSC_CLOCK_MHZ  25      /* Internal oscillator with 25 MHz */
> >
> >  #define PCA9685_NUMREGS                0xFF
> > @@ -74,7 +73,7 @@
> >  struct pca9685 {
> >         struct pwm_chip chip;
> >         struct regmap *regmap;
> > -       int period_ns;
> > +       int prescale;
> 
> You've decided to cache the prescale register...
> 
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIOLIB)
> >         struct mutex lock;
> >         struct gpio_chip gpio;
> > @@ -246,18 +245,117 @@ static void pca9685_set_sleep_mode(struct pca9685 *pca, bool enable)
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > -static int pca9685_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> > -                             int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> > +static void pca9685_pwm_full_off(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> > +                                struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > +{
> > +       struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip);
> > +       int reg;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * Set the full OFF bit to cause the PWM channel to be always off.
> > +        * The full OFF bit has precedence over the other register values.
> > +        */
> > +
> > +       if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > +               reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_H;
> > +       else
> > +               reg = LED_N_OFF_H(pwm->hwpwm);
> > +
> > +       regmap_write(pca->regmap, reg, LED_FULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pca9685_pwm_full_on(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> > +                               struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > +{
> > +       struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip);
> > +       int reg;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * Clear the OFF registers (including the full OFF bit) and set
> > +        * the full ON bit to cause the PWM channel to be always on.
> > +        */
> > +
> > +       if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > +               reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_L;
> > +       else
> > +               reg = LED_N_OFF_L(pwm->hwpwm);
> > +
> > +       regmap_write(pca->regmap, reg, 0x0);
> > +
> > +       if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > +               reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_H;
> > +       else
> > +               reg = LED_N_OFF_H(pwm->hwpwm);
> > +
> > +       regmap_write(pca->regmap, reg, 0x0);
> > +
> > +       if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > +               reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_ON_H;
> > +       else
> > +               reg = LED_N_ON_H(pwm->hwpwm);
> > +
> > +       regmap_write(pca->regmap, reg, LED_FULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pca9685_pwm_read_global_period(struct pca9685 *pca)
> 
> but in this function, you don't seem to use the cached prescale
> value, but read it out again instead?

Good point.
I wanted .get_state to read out the actual HW state but the cached
prescale register should always be identical to that, so it should be OK
to use it here.

> > +{
> > +       unsigned int prescale = 0;
> > +
> > +       regmap_read(pca->regmap, PCA9685_PRESCALE, &prescale);
> > +
> > +       if (prescale < PCA9685_PRESCALE_MIN || prescale > PCA9685_PRESCALE_MAX)
> > +               return 0;
> > +
> > +       return (PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE * 1000 / PCA9685_OSC_CLOCK_MHZ) *
> > +               (prescale + 1);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pca9685_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> > +                                 struct pwm_state *state)
> > +{
> > +       struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip);
> > +       unsigned int val, duty;
> > +       int reg;
> > +
> > +       /* Read out (chip-wide) period */
> > +       state->period = pca9685_pwm_read_global_period(pca);
> > +
> > +       /* The (per-channel) polarity is fixed */
> > +       state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
> > +
> > +       /* Read out current duty cycle and enabled state */
> > +       reg = pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN ? PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_H :
> > +               LED_N_OFF_H(pwm->hwpwm);
> > +       regmap_read(pca->regmap, reg, &val);
> > +       duty = (val & 0xf) << 8;
> > +
> > +       state->enabled = !(val & LED_FULL);
> > +
> > +       reg = pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN ? PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_L :
> > +               LED_N_OFF_L(pwm->hwpwm);
> > +       regmap_read(pca->regmap, reg, &val);
> > +       duty |= (val & 0xff);
> > +
> > +       if (duty < PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE) {
> > +               duty *= state->period;
> > +               state->duty_cycle = duty / (PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE - 1);
> > +       } else
> > +               state->duty_cycle = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pca9685_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> > +                            const struct pwm_state *state)
> >  {
> >         struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip);
> > -       unsigned long long duty;
> > +       unsigned long long duty, prescale;
> >         unsigned int reg;
> > -       int prescale;
> >
> > -       if (period_ns != pca->period_ns) {
> > -               prescale = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(PCA9685_OSC_CLOCK_MHZ * period_ns,
> > -                                            PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE * 1000) - 1;
> > +       if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> > +               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > +       prescale = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(PCA9685_OSC_CLOCK_MHZ * state->period,
> > +                                        PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE * 1000) - 1;
> > +       if (prescale != pca->prescale) {
> 
> Use of cached prescale here, all good.
> 
> >                 if (prescale >= PCA9685_PRESCALE_MIN &&
> >                         prescale <= PCA9685_PRESCALE_MAX) {
> >                         /*
> > @@ -270,12 +368,13 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >                         pca9685_set_sleep_mode(pca, true);
> >
> >                         /* Change the chip-wide output frequency */
> > -                       regmap_write(pca->regmap, PCA9685_PRESCALE, prescale);
> > +                       regmap_write(pca->regmap, PCA9685_PRESCALE,
> > +                                    (int)prescale);
> >
> >                         /* Wake the chip up */
> >                         pca9685_set_sleep_mode(pca, false);
> >
> > -                       pca->period_ns = period_ns;
> > +                       pca->prescale = (int)prescale;
> >                 } else {
> >                         dev_err(chip->dev,
> >                                 "prescaler not set: period out of bounds!\n");
> > @@ -283,46 +382,18 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >                 }
> >         }
> >
> > -       if (duty_ns < 1) {
> > -               if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > -                       reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_H;
> > -               else
> > -                       reg = LED_N_OFF_H(pwm->hwpwm);
> > -
> > -               regmap_write(pca->regmap, reg, LED_FULL);
> > -
> > +       if (!state->enabled || state->duty_cycle < 1) {
> > +               pca9685_pwm_full_off(chip, pwm);
> >                 return 0;
> >         }
> >
> > -       if (duty_ns == period_ns) {
> > -               /* Clear both OFF registers */
> > -               if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > -                       reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_L;
> > -               else
> > -                       reg = LED_N_OFF_L(pwm->hwpwm);
> > -
> > -               regmap_write(pca->regmap, reg, 0x0);
> > -
> > -               if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > -                       reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_H;
> > -               else
> > -                       reg = LED_N_OFF_H(pwm->hwpwm);
> > -
> > -               regmap_write(pca->regmap, reg, 0x0);
> > -
> > -               /* Set the full ON bit */
> > -               if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > -                       reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_ON_H;
> > -               else
> > -                       reg = LED_N_ON_H(pwm->hwpwm);
> > -
> > -               regmap_write(pca->regmap, reg, LED_FULL);
> > -
> > +       if (state->duty_cycle == state->period) {
> > +               pca9685_pwm_full_on(chip, pwm);
> >                 return 0;
> >         }
> >
> > -       duty = PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE * (unsigned long long)duty_ns;
> > -       duty = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(duty, period_ns);
> > +       duty = (PCA9685_COUNTER_RANGE - 1) * state->duty_cycle;
> > +       duty = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(duty, state->period);
> >
> >         if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> >                 reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_L;
> > @@ -349,64 +420,6 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int pca9685_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > -{
> > -       struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip);
> > -       unsigned int reg;
> > -
> > -       /*
> > -        * The PWM subsystem does not support a pre-delay.
> > -        * So, set the ON-timeout to 0
> > -        */
> > -       if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > -               reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_ON_L;
> > -       else
> > -               reg = LED_N_ON_L(pwm->hwpwm);
> > -
> > -       regmap_write(pca->regmap, reg, 0);
> > -
> > -       if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > -               reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_ON_H;
> > -       else
> > -               reg = LED_N_ON_H(pwm->hwpwm);
> > -
> > -       regmap_write(pca->regmap, reg, 0);
> > -
> > -       /*
> > -        * Clear the full-off bit.
> > -        * It has precedence over the others and must be off.
> > -        */
> > -       if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > -               reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_H;
> > -       else
> > -               reg = LED_N_OFF_H(pwm->hwpwm);
> > -
> > -       regmap_update_bits(pca->regmap, reg, LED_FULL, 0x0);
> > -
> > -       return 0;
> > -}
> > -
> > -static void pca9685_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > -{
> > -       struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip);
> > -       unsigned int reg;
> > -
> > -       if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > -               reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_H;
> > -       else
> > -               reg = LED_N_OFF_H(pwm->hwpwm);
> > -
> > -       regmap_write(pca->regmap, reg, LED_FULL);
> > -
> > -       /* Clear the LED_OFF counter. */
> > -       if (pwm->hwpwm >= PCA9685_MAXCHAN)
> > -               reg = PCA9685_ALL_LED_OFF_L;
> > -       else
> > -               reg = LED_N_OFF_L(pwm->hwpwm);
> > -
> > -       regmap_write(pca->regmap, reg, 0x0);
> > -}
> > -
> >  static int pca9685_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> >  {
> >         struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip);
> > @@ -422,15 +435,14 @@ static void pca9685_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> >  {
> >         struct pca9685 *pca = to_pca(chip);
> >
> > -       pca9685_pwm_disable(chip, pwm);
> > +       pca9685_pwm_full_off(chip, pwm);
> >         pm_runtime_put(chip->dev);
> >         pca9685_pwm_clear_inuse(pca, pwm->hwpwm);
> >  }
> >
> >  static const struct pwm_ops pca9685_pwm_ops = {
> > -       .enable = pca9685_pwm_enable,
> > -       .disable = pca9685_pwm_disable,
> > -       .config = pca9685_pwm_config,
> > +       .get_state = pca9685_pwm_get_state,
> > +       .apply = pca9685_pwm_apply,
> >         .request = pca9685_pwm_request,
> >         .free = pca9685_pwm_free,
> >         .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > @@ -448,7 +460,7 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >  {
> >         struct pca9685 *pca;
> >         unsigned int reg;
> > -       int ret;
> > +       int prescale = 0, ret;
> >
> >         pca = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*pca), GFP_KERNEL);
> >         if (!pca)
> > @@ -461,10 +473,13 @@ static int pca9685_pwm_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> >                         ret);
> >                 return ret;
> >         }
> > -       pca->period_ns = PCA9685_DEFAULT_PERIOD;
> >
> >         i2c_set_clientdata(client, pca);
> >
> > +       regmap_read(pca->regmap, PCA9685_PRESCALE, &prescale);
> > +       if (prescale < PCA9685_PRESCALE_MIN || prescale > PCA9685_PRESCALE_MAX)
> > +               pca->prescale = prescale;
> 
> I'm not sure this will cache the prescale value correctly,
> the logic seems inverted

You are right, that's a mistake.

> You appear to mix cached and uncached uses of prescale,
> is there a need for this? If not, perhaps pick one and use
> it consistently?

Yes, sticking to the cached value is probably the way to go.

> Perhaps you can define a is_prescale_valid() helper,
> which is easier to read.
> And it can be easily negated:
>     if (!is_prescale_valid(prescale))
> without getting confused between </>. <=/>=, and ||/&&.

Good idea!

> Also, if the prescale register contains an invalid value
> during probe(), e.g. 0x00 or 0x01, would it make sense
> to explicitly overwrite it with a valid setting?

As long as it is overwritten with a correct setting when the PWM is used
for the first time, it should be OK?

Thanks,
Clemens

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-19 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-18 17:44 [PATCH 1/3] pwm: pca9685: Switch to atomic API Clemens Gruber
2020-11-18 17:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] pwm: pca9685: Set full OFF bits in probe Clemens Gruber
2020-11-18 17:44 ` [PATCH 3/3] pwm: pca9685: Support staggered output ON times Clemens Gruber
2020-11-19  0:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] pwm: pca9685: Switch to atomic API Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-11-19 10:00   ` Clemens Gruber [this message]
2020-11-19 14:58     ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-11-19 16:00       ` Clemens Gruber
2020-11-19 17:29         ` Sven Van Asbroeck
2020-11-21 14:58           ` Clemens Gruber
2020-11-21 22:00             ` Sven Van Asbroeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201119100005.GA703@workstation.tuxnet \
    --to=clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com \
    --cc=david@protonic.nl \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=thesven73@gmail.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox