From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>,
Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel/cpu: add arch override for clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() mm handling
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:06:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201120100625.GB3021@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201120025757.325930-2-npiggin@gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:57:56PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> powerpc keeps a counter in the mm which counts bits set in mm_cpumask as
> well as other things. This means it can't use generic code to clear bits
> out of the mask and doesn't adjust the arch specific counter.
>
> Add an arch override allowing powerpc to use clear_tasks_mm_cpumask().
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Seems reasonable enough..
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
> kernel/cpu.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 6ff2578ecf17..2b8d7a5db383 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -815,6 +815,10 @@ void __init cpuhp_threads_init(void)
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> +#ifndef arch_clear_mm_cpumask_cpu
> +#define arch_clear_mm_cpumask_cpu(cpu, mm) cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(mm))
> +#endif
> +
> /**
> * clear_tasks_mm_cpumask - Safely clear tasks' mm_cpumask for a CPU
> * @cpu: a CPU id
> @@ -850,7 +854,7 @@ void clear_tasks_mm_cpumask(int cpu)
> t = find_lock_task_mm(p);
> if (!t)
> continue;
> - cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, mm_cpumask(t->mm));
> + arch_clear_mm_cpumask_cpu(cpu, t->mm);
> task_unlock(t);
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> --
> 2.23.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-20 2:57 [PATCH 0/2] powerpc/64s: fix for CPU hotplug vs mm_cpumask bug Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-20 2:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] kernel/cpu: add arch override for clear_tasks_mm_cpumask() mm handling Nicholas Piggin
2020-11-20 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-11-20 2:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/64s: Trim offlined CPUs from mm_cpumasks Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-10 9:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-12-14 4:15 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-14 10:43 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-12-14 11:04 ` Nicholas Piggin
2020-12-15 10:33 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201120100625.GB3021@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anton.vorontsov@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox