From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/6] arm/arm64: Allow the rescheduling IPI to bypass irq_enter/exit
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:14:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201124141449.572446-1-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
This is the second version of my earlier series [1], which aims at
fixing (or papering over, depending on how you look at things) a
performance regression seen on arm64 for reched IPI heavy workloads
(such as "perf bench sched pipe").
As eloquently described by Thomas in his earlier replies [2], the
current situation is less than ideal on most architecture except x86,
and my conclusion is that what was broken in 5.9 wouldn't be more
broken in 5.10 with these patches (and addresses the performance
regression).
Needless to say, I intend to try and help fixing the issues Thomas
mentioned, and I believe that Mark (cc'd) already has something that
could be used as a healthy starting point (Mark, do correct me if I
misrepresented your work).
Thanks,
M.
* From v1:
- Added a new __irq_modify_status() helper
- Renamed IRQ_NAKED to IRQ_RAW
- Renamed IRQ_HIDDEN to IRQ_IPI
- Applied the same workaround to 32bit ARM for completeness
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201101131430.257038-1-maz@kernel.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/87lfewnmdz.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de/
Marc Zyngier (6):
genirq: Add __irq_modify_status() helper to clear/set special flags
genirq: Allow an interrupt to be marked as 'raw'
arm64: Mark the recheduling IPI as raw interrupt
arm: Mark the recheduling IPI as raw interrupt
genirq: Drop IRQ_HIDDEN from IRQF_MODIFY_MASK
genirq: Rename IRQ_HIDDEN to IRQ_IPI
arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 6 +++++-
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c | 6 +++++-
include/linux/irq.h | 11 ++++++++---
kernel/irq/Kconfig | 3 +++
kernel/irq/chip.c | 12 ++++++++++--
kernel/irq/debugfs.c | 3 ++-
kernel/irq/irqdesc.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
kernel/irq/proc.c | 2 +-
kernel/irq/settings.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
11 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
2.28.0
next reply other threads:[~2020-11-24 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 14:14 Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] genirq: Add __irq_modify_status() helper to clear/set special flags Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] genirq: Allow an interrupt to be marked as 'raw' Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 16:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 16:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 18:18 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-12-03 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-03 15:52 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-12-05 19:24 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-12-10 15:07 ` Will Deacon
2021-06-23 17:28 ` Todd Kjos
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] arm64: Mark the recheduling IPI as raw interrupt Marc Zyngier
2020-12-10 15:15 ` Will Deacon
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] arm: " Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] genirq: Drop IRQ_HIDDEN from IRQF_MODIFY_MASK Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 14:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] genirq: Rename IRQ_HIDDEN to IRQ_IPI Marc Zyngier
2020-11-26 18:18 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-03-01 0:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] arm/arm64: Allow the rescheduling IPI to bypass irq_enter/exit ito-yuichi
2021-03-01 9:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-09 6:20 ` Yuichi Ito
2021-06-18 19:30 ` Abhijeet Dharmapurikar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201124141449.572446-1-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=Valentin.Schneider@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox