From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0 03/19] x86/insn: Add an insn_decode() API
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 20:25:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201125192553.GD9996@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201126015333.fb0fb2b548013073ce72f19f@kernel.org>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 01:53:33AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (only from the viewpoint of VEX coding, a bit stricter, but not perfect.)
Yeah, I wanted to document the fact that it has changed behavior in the
commit message - we'll make it perfect later. :-)
> > @@ -98,8 +101,12 @@ static void insn_get_emulate_prefix(struct insn *insn)
> > * Populates the @insn->prefixes bitmap, and updates @insn->next_byte
> > * to point to the (first) opcode. No effect if @insn->prefixes.got
> > * is already set.
> > + *
> > + * * Returns:
> > + * 0: on success
> > + * !0: on error
> > */
>
> So this is different from...
>
> [..]
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * insn_decode() - Decode an x86 instruction
> > + * @insn: &struct insn to be initialized
> > + * @kaddr: address (in kernel memory) of instruction (or copy thereof)
> > + * @buf_len: length of the insn buffer at @kaddr
> > + * @m: insn mode, see enum insn_mode
> > + *
> > + * Returns:
> > + * 0: if decoding succeeded
> > + * < 0: otherwise.
>
> this return value.
>
> Even for the insn_get_*(), I would like to see them returning -EINVAL
> as same as insn_decode(). Same API group has different return value is
> confusing.
Right, my goal in the end here is to make *all* users of the decoder
call insn_decode() and nothing else. And there you can have different
return values so checking negative/positive is the proper way to go.
Those other helpers, though, should then become internal and for those I
think it is easier to use them when they return a boolean yes/no value,
meaning, they do one thing and one thing only:
For example, it is more readable to do:
if (insn_...)
vs
int ret;
...
ret = insn_,...()
if (ret)
...
which is 4 more lines of error handling and return variable, leading to
more code.
But if you want to be able to use those other helpers outside of the
decoder - for whatever reason - then sure, the function signatures
should be the same.
Thoughts?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-25 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 10:19 [RFC PATCH v0 00/19] x86/insn: Add an insn_decode() API Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 01/19] x86/insn: Rename insn_decode() to insn_decode_regs() Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 02/19] x86/insn: Add @buf_len param to insn_init() kernel-doc comment Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 03/19] x86/insn: Add an insn_decode() API Borislav Petkov
2020-11-25 16:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-25 19:25 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-11-26 1:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-26 17:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-27 5:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 04/19] x86/insn-eval: Handle return values from the decoder Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 05/19] x86/boot/compressed/sev-es: Convert to insn_decode() Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 06/19] perf/x86/intel/ds: Check insn_get_length() retval Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 07/19] perf/x86/intel/ds: Check return values of insn decoder functions Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 08/19] x86/alternative: Use insn_decode() Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 09/19] x86/mce: Convert to insn_decode() Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 10/19] x86/kprobes: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-25 17:19 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 11/19] x86/sev-es: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 12/19] x86/traps: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 13/19] x86/uprobes: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 14/19] x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 15/19] tools/objtool: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 16/19] x86/tools/insn_sanity: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 17/19] tools/perf: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 18/19] x86/insn: Remove kernel_insn_init() Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 19/19] x86/insn: Make insn_complete() static Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 17:46 ` [RFC PATCH v0 00/19] x86/insn: Add an insn_decode() API Borislav Petkov
2020-11-25 8:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-27 17:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-27 22:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-29 8:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-30 13:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-30 17:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-02 18:04 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201125192553.GD9996@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox