From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0 03/19] x86/insn: Add an insn_decode() API
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 01:53:33 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201126015333.fb0fb2b548013073ce72f19f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201124101952.7909-4-bp@alien8.de>
Hi Borislav,
On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 11:19:36 +0100
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
>
> Users of the instruction decoder should use this to decode instruction
> bytes. For that, have insn*() helpers return an int value to denote
> success/failure.
>
> While at it, make insn_get_opcode() more stricter as to whether what has
> seen so far is a valid insn and if not.
(only from the viewpoint of VEX coding, a bit stricter, but not perfect.)
> Copy linux/kconfig.h for the tools-version of the decoder so that it can
> use IS_ENABLED().
>
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h | 24 ++--
> arch/x86/lib/insn.c | 182 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> tools/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h | 24 ++--
> tools/arch/x86/lib/insn.c | 182 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> tools/include/linux/kconfig.h | 73 ++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 391 insertions(+), 94 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/include/linux/kconfig.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
> index 5c1ae3eff9d4..e80ddfe86255 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
> @@ -87,13 +87,23 @@ struct insn {
> #define X86_VEX_M_MAX 0x1f /* VEX3.M Maximum value */
>
> extern void insn_init(struct insn *insn, const void *kaddr, int buf_len, int x86_64);
> -extern void insn_get_prefixes(struct insn *insn);
> -extern void insn_get_opcode(struct insn *insn);
> -extern void insn_get_modrm(struct insn *insn);
> -extern void insn_get_sib(struct insn *insn);
> -extern void insn_get_displacement(struct insn *insn);
> -extern void insn_get_immediate(struct insn *insn);
> -extern void insn_get_length(struct insn *insn);
> +extern int insn_get_prefixes(struct insn *insn);
> +extern int insn_get_opcode(struct insn *insn);
> +extern int insn_get_modrm(struct insn *insn);
> +extern int insn_get_sib(struct insn *insn);
> +extern int insn_get_displacement(struct insn *insn);
> +extern int insn_get_immediate(struct insn *insn);
> +extern int insn_get_length(struct insn *insn);
> +
> +enum insn_mode {
> + INSN_MODE_32,
> + INSN_MODE_64,
> + /* Mode is determined by the current kernel build. */
> + INSN_MODE_KERN,
> + INSN_NUM_MODES,
> +};
> +
> +extern int insn_decode(struct insn *insn, const void *kaddr, int buf_len, enum insn_mode m);
>
> /* Attribute will be determined after getting ModRM (for opcode groups) */
> static inline void insn_get_attribute(struct insn *insn)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn.c
> index 1ba994862b56..1f749e3b4a25 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/lib/insn.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
> #include <asm/inat.h>
> #include <asm/insn.h>
>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/kconfig.h>
> +
> #include <asm/emulate_prefix.h>
>
> /* Verify next sizeof(t) bytes can be on the same instruction */
> @@ -98,8 +101,12 @@ static void insn_get_emulate_prefix(struct insn *insn)
> * Populates the @insn->prefixes bitmap, and updates @insn->next_byte
> * to point to the (first) opcode. No effect if @insn->prefixes.got
> * is already set.
> + *
> + * * Returns:
> + * 0: on success
> + * !0: on error
> */
So this is different from...
[..]
> +
> +/**
> + * insn_decode() - Decode an x86 instruction
> + * @insn: &struct insn to be initialized
> + * @kaddr: address (in kernel memory) of instruction (or copy thereof)
> + * @buf_len: length of the insn buffer at @kaddr
> + * @m: insn mode, see enum insn_mode
> + *
> + * Returns:
> + * 0: if decoding succeeded
> + * < 0: otherwise.
this return value.
Even for the insn_get_*(), I would like to see them returning -EINVAL
as same as insn_decode(). Same API group has different return value is
confusing.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-25 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 10:19 [RFC PATCH v0 00/19] x86/insn: Add an insn_decode() API Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 01/19] x86/insn: Rename insn_decode() to insn_decode_regs() Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 02/19] x86/insn: Add @buf_len param to insn_init() kernel-doc comment Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 03/19] x86/insn: Add an insn_decode() API Borislav Petkov
2020-11-25 16:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2020-11-25 19:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-26 1:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-26 17:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-27 5:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 04/19] x86/insn-eval: Handle return values from the decoder Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 05/19] x86/boot/compressed/sev-es: Convert to insn_decode() Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 06/19] perf/x86/intel/ds: Check insn_get_length() retval Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 07/19] perf/x86/intel/ds: Check return values of insn decoder functions Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 08/19] x86/alternative: Use insn_decode() Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 09/19] x86/mce: Convert to insn_decode() Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 10/19] x86/kprobes: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-25 17:19 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 11/19] x86/sev-es: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 12/19] x86/traps: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 13/19] x86/uprobes: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 14/19] x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 15/19] tools/objtool: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 16/19] x86/tools/insn_sanity: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 17/19] tools/perf: " Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 18/19] x86/insn: Remove kernel_insn_init() Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 10:19 ` [RFC PATCH v0 19/19] x86/insn: Make insn_complete() static Borislav Petkov
2020-11-24 17:46 ` [RFC PATCH v0 00/19] x86/insn: Add an insn_decode() API Borislav Petkov
2020-11-25 8:03 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-27 17:45 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-27 22:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-29 8:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-11-30 13:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-30 17:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-02 18:04 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201126015333.fb0fb2b548013073ce72f19f@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox