public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	rcu <rcu@vger.kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rcu/segcblist: Add debug checks for segment lengths
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:58:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201202145838.GA949146@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201202042143.GK1437@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 08:21:43PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 05:26:32PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 3:42 PM Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:16:15PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 02:44:35PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 2:22 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 11:15:41AM -0500, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > After rcu_do_batch(), add a check for whether the seglen counts went to
> > > > > > > > > > > zero if the list was indeed empty.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Queued for testing and further review, thank you!
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > FYI, the second of the two checks triggered in all four one-hour runs of
> > > > > > > > > TREE01, all four one-hour runs of TREE04, and one of the four one-hour
> > > > > > > > > runs of TREE07.  This one:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > WARN_ON_ONCE(count != 0 && rcu_segcblist_n_segment_cbs(&rdp->cblist) == 0);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That is, there are callbacks in the list, but the sum of the segment
> > > > > > > > > counts is nevertheless zero.  The ->nocb_lock is held.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thoughts?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > FWIW, TREE01 reproduces it very quickly compared to the other two
> > > > > > > > scenarios, on all four run, within five minutes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So far for TREE01, I traced it down to an rcu_barrier happening so it could
> > > > > > > be related to some interaction with rcu_barrier() (Just a guess).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well, rcu_barrier() and srcu_barrier() are the only users of
> > > > > > rcu_segcblist_entrain(), if that helps.  Your modification to that
> > > > > > function looks plausible to me, but the system's opinion always overrules
> > > > > > mine.  ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Right. Does anything the bypass code standout? That happens during
> > > > > rcu_barrier() as well, and it messes with the lengths.
> > > >
> > > > In theory, rcu_barrier_func() flushes the bypass before doing the
> > > > entrain, and does the rcu_segcblist_entrain() afterwards.
> > > >
> > > > Ah, and that is the issue.  If ->cblist is empty and ->nocb_bypass
> > > > is not, then ->cblist length will be nonzero, and none of the
> > > > segments will be nonzero.
> > > >
> > > > So you need something like this for that second WARN, correct?
> > > >
> > > >       WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_segcblist_empty(&rdp->cblist) &&
> > > >                    rcu_segcblist_n_segment_cbs(&rdp->cblist) == 0);
> > 
> > Just started to look into it again. If the &rdp->cblist is empty, that
> > means the bypass list could not have been used (Since per comments on
> > rcu_nocb_try_bypass() , the bypass list is in use only when the cblist
> > is non-empty). So the cblist was non empty, then the segment counts
> > should not sum to 0.  So I don't think that explains it. Anyway, I
> > will try the new version of your warning in case there is something
> > about bypass lists that I'm missing.
> 
> Good point.  I really did see failures, though.  Do they show up for
> you?

Yeah I do see failures. Once I change the warning as below, the failures go
away though. So looks like indeed a segcblist can be empty when the bypass
list has something in it?  If you agree, could you change the warning to as
below? The tests failing before all pass 1 hour rcutorture testing now
(TREE01, TREE04 and TREE07).

---8<-----------------------

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 91e35b521e51..3cd92b7df8ac 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2554,7 +2554,8 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU) &&
 		     count != 0 && rcu_segcblist_empty(&rdp->cblist));
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(count == 0 && rcu_segcblist_n_segment_cbs(&rdp->cblist) != 0);
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(count != 0 && rcu_segcblist_n_segment_cbs(&rdp->cblist) == 0);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_segcblist_empty(&rdp->cblist) &&
+		     rcu_segcblist_n_segment_cbs(&rdp->cblist) == 0);
 
 	rcu_nocb_unlock_irqrestore(rdp, flags);
 
-- 
2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-02 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-18 16:15 [PATCH v2] rcu/segcblist: Add debug checks for segment lengths Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-18 20:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-19  3:52   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-19  3:56     ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-19 18:32       ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-19 19:22         ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-19 19:44           ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-19 20:16             ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-11-19 20:42               ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-01 22:26                 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-02  4:21                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-02 14:58                     ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2020-12-02 15:25                       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201202145838.GA949146@google.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox