From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Wei Huang <whuang2@amd.com>
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punitagrawal@gmail.com>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, wei.huang2@amd.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Add processor to the ignore PSD override list
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 21:26:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201207202610.GG20489@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cadb5d57-5aaf-79bc-e30e-502d5e522689@amd.com>
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 02:20:55PM -0600, Wei Huang wrote:
> In summary, this patch is fine if Punit already verified it. My only
> concern is the list can potentially increase over the time, and we will
> keep coming back to fix override_acpi_psd() function.
Can the detection be done by looking at those _PSD things instead of
comparing f/m/s?
And, alternatively, what is this fixing?
So what if some zen2 boxes have correct _PSD objects? Why do they need
to ignore the override?
Hmmm?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-07 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-25 14:48 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Punit Agrawal
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Re-factor overriding ACPI PSD Punit Agrawal
2020-12-07 19:29 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-08 23:31 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Punit Agrawal
2020-12-07 20:20 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-07 20:26 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-12-07 22:07 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-07 22:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-08 3:44 ` Wei Huang
2020-12-08 23:21 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-08 23:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-11 23:36 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-14 12:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-14 13:27 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-14 14:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-17 13:27 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/cpu: amd: Define processor families Punit Agrawal
2020-11-30 14:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-02 14:13 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-02 16:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-25 14:48 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Use identifiers for AMD processor family Punit Agrawal
2020-11-30 14:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-02 14:30 ` Punit Agrawal
2020-12-04 22:44 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add processor to the ignore PSD override list Punit Agrawal
2020-12-07 13:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-12-08 23:25 ` Punit Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201207202610.GG20489@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=punitagrawal@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=whuang2@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).