From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com,
Matthew Ruffell <matthew.ruffell@canonical.com>,
Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Revert "dm raid: remove unnecessary discard limits for raid10"
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 17:36:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201209223615.GA2752@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201209215814.2623617-1-songliubraving@fb.com>
On Wed, Dec 09 2020 at 4:58pm -0500,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
> This reverts commit f0e90b6c663a7e3b4736cb318c6c7c589f152c28.
>
> Matthew Ruffell reported data corruption in raid10 due to the changes
> in discard handling [1]. Revert these changes before we find a proper fix.
>
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1907262/
> Cc: Matthew Ruffell <matthew.ruffell@canonical.com>
> Cc: Xiao Ni <xni@redhat.com>
> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
If you're reverting all the MD code that enabled this DM change, then
obviously the DM change must be reverted too. But please do _not_
separate the DM revert from the MD reverts.
Please include this in a v2 pull request to Jens.
Mike
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> index 9c1f7c4de65b3..dc8568ab96f24 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> @@ -3728,6 +3728,17 @@ static void raid_io_hints(struct dm_target *ti, struct queue_limits *limits)
>
> blk_limits_io_min(limits, chunk_size_bytes);
> blk_limits_io_opt(limits, chunk_size_bytes * mddev_data_stripes(rs));
> +
> + /*
> + * RAID10 personality requires bio splitting,
> + * RAID0/1/4/5/6 don't and process large discard bios properly.
> + */
> + if (rs_is_raid10(rs)) {
> + limits->discard_granularity = max(chunk_size_bytes,
> + limits->discard_granularity);
> + limits->max_discard_sectors = min_not_zero(rs->md.chunk_sectors,
> + limits->max_discard_sectors);
> + }
> }
>
> static void raid_postsuspend(struct dm_target *ti)
> --
> 2.24.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-09 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-09 21:58 [PATCH] Revert "dm raid: remove unnecessary discard limits for raid10" Song Liu
2020-12-09 22:36 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2020-12-09 23:14 ` Song Liu
2020-12-09 22:38 ` Mike Snitzer
2020-12-10 4:09 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot
2020-12-10 5:33 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201209223615.GA2752@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.ruffell@canonical.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=xni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).