From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD0EC433FE for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3495E23A7C for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727214AbgLJK1d (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 05:27:33 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:53924 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725988AbgLJK1R (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Dec 2020 05:27:17 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0d4100a171b3ea1c390962.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0d:4100:a171:b3ea:1c39:962]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 3452C1EC054E; Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:26:31 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1607595991; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=vf9Zlp+3Kfqw0T186f/Eo5AjlBZAfwUY/WJoVr5Mbc4=; b=mjAsE24CIP5fp48Ydf7wK7bYRSJrzEf8vLy4shcWTaDTplyutx1ULcvZbGtUZiOISY6HZ3 tkV41ZTEk4229AdukjxIPH4g8fJEQ3vjW70Px70ibOpIeLJTISqkkOGsAkb9l4rr+cOQ4O Jzrc+S8FEU5bYn8i66TAIhq59O81nJY= Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:26:25 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Xiaochen Shen Cc: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip: x86/cache] x86/resctrl: Fix incorrect local bandwidth when mba_sc is enabled Message-ID: <20201210102625.GA26529@zn.tnic> References: <1607063279-19437-1-git-send-email-xiaochen.shen@intel.com> <160754081861.3364.12382697409765236626.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> <20201209222328.GA20710@zn.tnic> <343e2fc7-6f64-d1b7-2ea1-cd422596f5be@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <343e2fc7-6f64-d1b7-2ea1-cd422596f5be@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 12:45:11PM +0800, Xiaochen Shen wrote: > Thank you for clarifying this issue. It is not a 0-DAY CI issue. Which begs the question: this patch should be Cc: stable and should go in now, shouldn't it? Because then the first submission applies cleanly ontop of tip:x86/urgent. I mean, it is fixing only reporting but that reporting is kinda waaay off. Hmmm? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette