From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] tick: Remove pointless cpu valid check in hotplug code
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 23:31:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201211223155.GC595642@lothringen> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201206212002.582579516@linutronix.de>
On Sun, Dec 06, 2020 at 10:12:54PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> tick_handover_do_timer() which is invoked when a CPU is unplugged has a
> check for cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask) when it tries to hand over the
> tick update duty.
>
> Checking the result of cpumask_first() there is pointless because if the
> online mask is empty at this point, then this would be the last CPU in the
> system going offline, which is impossible. There is always at least one CPU
> remaining. If online mask would be really empty then the timer duty would
> be the least of the resulting problems.
>
> Remove the well meant check simply because it is pointless and confusing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-common.c | 10 +++-------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> @@ -407,17 +407,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_broadcast_oneshot
> /*
> * Transfer the do_timer job away from a dying cpu.
> *
> - * Called with interrupts disabled. Not locking required. If
> + * Called with interrupts disabled. No locking required. If
> * tick_do_timer_cpu is owned by this cpu, nothing can change it.
> */
> void tick_handover_do_timer(void)
> {
> - if (tick_do_timer_cpu == smp_processor_id()) {
> - int cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
> -
> - tick_do_timer_cpu = (cpu < nr_cpu_ids) ? cpu :
> - TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE;
> - }
> + if (tick_do_timer_cpu == smp_processor_id())
> + tick_do_timer_cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
> }
BTW since we have that, why do we need:
static bool can_stop_idle_tick(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
{
/*
* If this CPU is offline and it is the one which updates
* jiffies, then give up the assignment and let it be taken by
* the CPU which runs the tick timer next. If we don't drop
* this here the jiffies might be stale and do_timer() never
* invoked.
*/
if (unlikely(!cpu_online(cpu))) {
if (cpu == tick_do_timer_cpu)
tick_do_timer_cpu = TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE;
We should only enter idle with an offline CPU after calling
tick_handover_do_timer() so (cpu == tick_do_timer_cpu) shouldn't be possible.
Or am I missing something?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-11 23:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-06 21:12 [patch 0/3] tick: Annotate and document the intentionaly racy tick_do_timer_cpu Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-06 21:12 ` [patch 1/3] tick: Remove pointless cpu valid check in hotplug code Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-07 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-07 17:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-11 22:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-12 0:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-12 1:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-11 22:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2020-12-16 10:50 ` [tip: timers/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-06 21:12 ` [patch 2/3] tick/sched: Remove bogus boot "safety" check Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-11 22:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-12-16 10:50 ` [tip: timers/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-06 21:12 ` [patch 3/3] tick: Annotate tick_do_timer_cpu data races Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-07 12:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-07 17:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-07 18:19 ` Marco Elver
2020-12-07 19:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-07 19:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-07 21:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-07 22:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-07 22:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-07 22:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-08 8:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-08 15:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-16 0:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-16 21:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-16 21:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-16 21:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-17 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-17 14:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-12-08 8:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-07 11:05 ` [patch 0/3] tick: Annotate and document the intentionaly racy tick_do_timer_cpu Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201211223155.GC595642@lothringen \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox