From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] workqueue: restore unbound_workers' cpumask correctly
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 23:54:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201214155457.3430-2-jiangshanlai@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201214155457.3430-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
When we restore workers' cpumask, we should restore them to the
designed pool->attrs->cpumask. And we need to only do it at
the first time.
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Reported-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index c71da2a59e12..aba71ab359dd 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -5031,9 +5031,13 @@ static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
cpumask_and(&cpumask, pool->attrs->cpumask, cpu_online_mask);
+ /* is @cpu the first one onlined for the @pool? */
+ if (cpumask_weight(&cpumask) > 1)
+ return;
+
/* as we're called from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail */
for_each_pool_worker(worker, pool)
- WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, &cpumask) < 0);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
}
int workqueue_prepare_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-14 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-14 15:54 [PATCH 00/10] workqueue: break affinity initiatively Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-14 15:54 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2020-12-14 15:54 ` [PATCH 02/10] workqueue: use cpu_possible_mask instead of cpu_active_mask to break affinity Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-14 17:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15 8:33 ` Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-15 8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-16 14:32 ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-14 15:54 ` [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: Manually break affinity on pool detachment Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-14 15:54 ` [PATCH 04/10] workqueue: don't set the worker's cpumask when kthread_bind_mask() Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-16 14:39 ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-14 15:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] workqueue: introduce wq_online_cpumask Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-14 15:54 ` [PATCH 06/10] workqueue: use wq_online_cpumask in restore_unbound_workers_cpumask() Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-14 15:54 ` [PATCH 07/10] workqueue: Manually break affinity on hotplug for unbound pool Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-16 14:50 ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-14 15:54 ` [PATCH 08/10] workqueue: reorganize workqueue_online_cpu() Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-14 15:54 ` [PATCH 09/10] workqueue: reorganize workqueue_offline_cpu() unbind_workers() Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-14 15:54 ` [PATCH 10/10] workqueue: Fix affinity of kworkers when attaching into pool Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-15 15:03 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-12-14 17:36 ` [PATCH 00/10] workqueue: break affinity initiatively Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15 5:44 ` Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-15 7:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15 8:14 ` Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-15 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15 9:46 ` Lai Jiangshan
2020-12-16 14:30 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201214155457.3430-2-jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--to=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox