public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mgorman@techsingularity.net, vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	aubrey.li@linux.intel.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
	qais.yousef@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
	tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, benbjiang@gmail.com
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: SIS_PROP the idle core scan
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 17:48:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201214170018.126628741@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20201214164822.402812729@infradead.org

Further unify the new select_idle_cpu() loop and remove the 'smt'
selection code and unconditionally use SIS_PROP, even for idle core
searches.

This effectively brings back the effects of select_idle_smt() which we
removed a few patches ago due to always iterating the target core.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 include/linux/sched/topology.h |    1 
 kernel/sched/fair.c            |   90 +++--------------------------------------
 kernel/sched/idle.c            |    1 
 kernel/sched/sched.h           |   13 -----
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/sched/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/topology.h
@@ -73,7 +73,6 @@ struct sched_group;
 struct sched_domain_shared {
 	atomic_t	ref;
 	atomic_t	nr_busy_cpus;
-	int		has_idle_cores;
 };
 
 struct sched_domain {
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1581,11 +1581,9 @@ numa_type numa_classify(unsigned int imb
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
 /* Forward declarations of select_idle_sibling helpers */
-static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def);
 static inline int numa_idle_core(int idle_core, int cpu)
 {
-	if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present) ||
-	    idle_core >= 0 || !test_idle_cores(cpu, false))
+	if (!static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present) || idle_core >= 0)
 		return idle_core;
 
 	/*
@@ -6020,60 +6018,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sched_smt_present);
 
 int sched_smt_weight = 1;
 
-static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
-{
-	struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
-
-	sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
-	if (sds)
-		WRITE_ONCE(sds->has_idle_cores, val);
-}
-
-static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
-{
-	struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
-
-	sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
-	if (sds)
-		return READ_ONCE(sds->has_idle_cores);
-
-	return def;
-}
-
-/*
- * Scans the local SMT mask to see if the entire core is idle, and records this
- * information in sd_llc_shared->has_idle_cores.
- *
- * Since SMT siblings share all cache levels, inspecting this limited remote
- * state should be fairly cheap.
- */
-void __update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
-{
-	int core = cpu_of(rq);
-	int cpu;
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	if (test_idle_cores(core, true))
-		goto unlock;
-
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(core)) {
-		if (cpu == core)
-			continue;
-
-		if (!available_idle_cpu(cpu))
-			goto unlock;
-	}
-
-	set_idle_cores(core, 1);
-unlock:
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-}
-
-/*
- * Scan the entire LLC domain for idle cores; this dynamically switches off if
- * there are no idle cores left in the system; tracked through
- * sd_llc->shared->has_idle_cores and enabled through update_idle_core() above.
- */
 static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
 {
 	bool idle = true;
@@ -6109,15 +6053,6 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_
 
 #define sched_smt_weight	1
 
-static inline void set_idle_cores(int cpu, int val)
-{
-}
-
-static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
-{
-	return def;
-}
-
 static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpus, int *idle_cpu)
 {
 	return __select_idle_cpu(p, core, cpus, idle_cpu);
@@ -6136,7 +6071,6 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_s
 {
 	struct cpumask *cpus = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(select_idle_mask);
 	int i, cpu, idle_cpu = -1, loops = 1, nr = INT_MAX;
-	bool smt = test_idle_cores(target, false);
 	int this = smp_processor_id();
 	struct sched_domain *this_sd;
 	u64 time;
@@ -6147,7 +6081,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_s
 
 	cpumask_and(cpus, sched_domain_span(sd), p->cpus_ptr);
 
-	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !smt) {
+	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
 		u64 avg_cost, avg_idle, span_avg;
 
 		/*
@@ -6169,17 +6103,10 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_s
 	}
 
 	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
-		if (smt) {
-			i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
-			if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
-				return i;
-
-		} else {
-			i = __select_idle_cpu(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
-			if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits) {
-				idle_cpu = i;
-				break;
-			}
+		i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
+		if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits) {
+			idle_cpu = i;
+			break;
 		}
 
 		if (loops >= nr)
@@ -6188,10 +6115,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_s
 		loops++;
 	}
 
-	if (smt)
-		set_idle_cores(this, false);
-
-	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP) && !smt) {
+	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
 		time = cpu_clock(this) - time;
 		time = div_u64(time, loops);
 		update_avg(&this_sd->avg_scan_cost, time);
--- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
@@ -428,7 +428,6 @@ static void put_prev_task_idle(struct rq
 
 static void set_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, bool first)
 {
-	update_idle_core(rq);
 	schedstat_inc(rq->sched_goidle);
 }
 
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1099,19 +1099,6 @@ static inline bool is_migration_disabled
 #endif
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
-extern void __update_idle_core(struct rq *rq);
-
-static inline void update_idle_core(struct rq *rq)
-{
-	if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_smt_present))
-		__update_idle_core(rq);
-}
-
-#else
-static inline void update_idle_core(struct rq *rq) { }
-#endif
-
 DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
 
 #define cpu_rq(cpu)		(&per_cpu(runqueues, (cpu)))



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-14 17:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-14 16:48 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] select_idle_sibling() wreckage Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-14 16:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Fix select_idle_cpu()s cost accounting Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15  3:36   ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-15  7:59     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15 11:45       ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-15 12:13       ` Li, Aubrey
2021-01-08 10:27       ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-08 13:01         ` Qais Yousef
2021-01-08 13:47           ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-08 13:41         ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-08 14:40           ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-08 15:10             ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-08 16:14               ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 14:36                 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-11 15:58                   ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-08 19:45               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-09 14:12                 ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 14:39                 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-08 19:49               ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-11 14:52                 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-08 20:21         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-09 13:59           ` Mel Gorman
2020-12-14 16:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-23 13:31   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-14 16:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Remove select_idle_smt() Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-14 16:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-14 16:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-12-16 12:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] select_idle_sibling() wreckage Li, Aubrey
2020-12-16 18:07   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-12-23 13:23     ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-04 15:40       ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201214170018.126628741@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benbjiang@gmail.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox