From: lalithambika.krishnakumar@intel.com
To: kbusch@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, axboe@fb.com, sagi@grimberg.me
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, lalithambika.krishnakumar@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH] nvme: avoid possible double fetch in handling CQE
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 14:09:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201223220900.11234-1-lalithambika.krishnakumar@intel.com> (raw)
From: Lalithambika Krishnakumar <lalithambika.krishnakumar@intel.com>
While handling the completion queue, keep a local copy of the command id
from the DMA-accessible completion entry. This silences a time-of-check
to time-of-use (TOCTOU) warning from KF/x[1], with respect to a
Thunderclap[2] vulnerability analysis. The double-read impact appears
benign.
There may be a theoretical window for @command_id to be used as an
adversary-controlled array-index-value for mounting a speculative
execution attack, but that mitigation is saved for a potential follow-on.
A man-in-the-middle attack on the data payload is out of scope for this
analysis and is hopefully mitigated by filesystem integrity mechanisms.
[1] https://github.com/intel/kernel-fuzzer-for-xen-project
[2] http://thunderclap.io/thunderclap-paper-ndss2019.pdf
Signed-off-by: Lalithambika Krishna Kumar <lalithambika.krishnakumar@intel.com>
---
drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
index b4385cb0ff60..88a7cb3fe2a2 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
@@ -967,6 +967,7 @@ static inline struct blk_mq_tags *nvme_queue_tagset(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq)
static inline void nvme_handle_cqe(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, u16 idx)
{
struct nvme_completion *cqe = &nvmeq->cqes[idx];
+ __u16 command_id = READ_ONCE(cqe->command_id);
struct request *req;
/*
@@ -975,17 +976,17 @@ static inline void nvme_handle_cqe(struct nvme_queue *nvmeq, u16 idx)
* aborts. We don't even bother to allocate a struct request
* for them but rather special case them here.
*/
- if (unlikely(nvme_is_aen_req(nvmeq->qid, cqe->command_id))) {
+ if (unlikely(nvme_is_aen_req(nvmeq->qid, command_id))) {
nvme_complete_async_event(&nvmeq->dev->ctrl,
cqe->status, &cqe->result);
return;
}
- req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(nvme_queue_tagset(nvmeq), cqe->command_id);
+ req = blk_mq_tag_to_rq(nvme_queue_tagset(nvmeq), command_id);
if (unlikely(!req)) {
dev_warn(nvmeq->dev->ctrl.device,
"invalid id %d completed on queue %d\n",
- cqe->command_id, le16_to_cpu(cqe->sq_id));
+ command_id, le16_to_cpu(cqe->sq_id));
return;
}
--
2.29.2
next reply other threads:[~2020-12-23 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-23 22:09 lalithambika.krishnakumar [this message]
2021-01-04 17:36 ` [PATCH] nvme: avoid possible double fetch in handling CQE Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201223220900.11234-1-lalithambika.krishnakumar@intel.com \
--to=lalithambika.krishnakumar@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox