[PATCH 5.10 676/717] iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: fix edge-trigger interrupts

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-28T14:32:36Z

From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>

commit 3f9bce7a22a3f8ac9d885c9d75bc45569f24ac8b upstream.

If we are using edge IRQs, new samples can arrive while processing
current interrupt since there are no hw guarantees the irq line
stays "low" long enough to properly detect the new interrupt.
In this case the new sample will be missed.
Polling FIFO status register in st_lsm6dsx_handler_thread routine
allow us to read new samples even if the interrupt arrives while
processing previous data and the timeslot where the line is "low"
is too short to be properly detected.

Fixes: 89ca88a7cdf2 ("iio: imu: st_lsm6dsx: support active-low interrupts")
Fixes: 290a6ce11d93 ("iio: imu: add support to lsm6dsx driver")
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5e93cda7dc1e665f5685c53ad8e9ea71dbae782d.1605378871.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/imu/st_lsm6dsx/st_lsm6dsx_core.c
@@ -2255,19 +2255,35 @@ st_lsm6dsx_report_motion_event(struct st
static irqreturn_t st_lsm6dsx_handler_thread(int irq, void *private)
{
struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw = private;
+ int fifo_len = 0, len;
bool event;
- int count;

event = st_lsm6dsx_report_motion_event(hw);

if (!hw->settings->fifo_ops.read_fifo)
return event ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;

- mutex_lock(&hw->fifo_lock);
- count = hw->settings->fifo_ops.read_fifo(hw);
- mutex_unlock(&hw->fifo_lock);
+ /*
+ * If we are using edge IRQs, new samples can arrive while
+ * processing current interrupt since there are no hw
+ * guarantees the irq line stays "low" long enough to properly
+ * detect the new interrupt. In this case the new sample will
+ * be missed.
+ * Polling FIFO status register allow us to read new
+ * samples even if the interrupt arrives while processing
+ * previous data and the timeslot where the line is "low" is
+ * too short to be properly detected.
+ */
+ do {
+ mutex_lock(&hw->fifo_lock);
+ len = hw->settings->fifo_ops.read_fifo(hw);
+ mutex_unlock(&hw->fifo_lock);

- return count || event ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
+ if (len > 0)
+ fifo_len += len;
+ } while (len > 0);
+
+ return fifo_len || event ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;
}

static int st_lsm6dsx_irq_setup(struct st_lsm6dsx_hw *hw)