From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, boris.brezillon@collabora.com,
sricharan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 16:23:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201231105303.GI7345@thinkpad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1608213776-19584-1-git-send-email-mdalam@codeaurora.org>
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 07:32:56PM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
> From QPIC version 2.0 onwards new register got added to
> read last codeword. This change will update the same.
>
> For first three code word READ_LOCATION_n register will be
> use.For last code wrod READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n register will be
> use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> index 667e4bf..eaef51d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
> #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_1 0xf24
> #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_2 0xf28
> #define NAND_READ_LOCATION_3 0xf2c
> +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0 0xf40
> +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1 0xf44
> +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2 0xf48
> +#define NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3 0xf4c
Please keep the alignment as before.
>
> /* dummy register offsets, used by write_reg_dma */
> #define NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE 0xdead
> @@ -187,6 +191,12 @@ nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_##reg, \
> ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) | \
> ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
>
> +#define nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last) \
> +nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_##reg, \
> + ((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) | \
> + ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) | \
> + ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
> +
> /*
> * Returns the actual register address for all NAND_DEV_ registers
> * (i.e. NAND_DEV_CMD0, NAND_DEV_CMD1, NAND_DEV_CMD2 and NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD)
> @@ -316,6 +326,10 @@ struct nandc_regs {
> __le32 read_location1;
> __le32 read_location2;
> __le32 read_location3;
> + __le32 read_location_last0;
> + __le32 read_location_last1;
> + __le32 read_location_last2;
> + __le32 read_location_last3;
>
> __le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_clr;
> __le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_set;
> @@ -644,6 +658,14 @@ static __le32 *offset_to_nandc_reg(struct nandc_regs *regs, int offset)
> return ®s->read_location2;
> case NAND_READ_LOCATION_3:
> return ®s->read_location3;
> + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0:
> + return ®s->read_location_last0;
> + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1:
> + return ®s->read_location_last1;
> + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2:
> + return ®s->read_location_last2;
> + case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3:
> + return ®s->read_location_last3;
> default:
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -719,9 +741,13 @@ static void update_rw_regs(struct qcom_nand_host *host, int num_cw, bool read)
> nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_STATUS, host->clrreadstatus);
> nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);
>
> - if (read)
> + if (read) {
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
> + host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
Forgot to add else? Otherwise both NAND_READ_LOCATION_n and NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n
will be used.
> nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
> host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1096,9 +1122,13 @@ static void config_nand_page_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
> static void
> config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
> {
> - if (nandc->props->is_bam)
> + if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
> + write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0,
> + 4, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
> NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
Don't you need to modify the number of registers to write? It can't be 4 all the
time if NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0 is used.
> + }
>
> write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> @@ -1633,16 +1663,28 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> }
>
> if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> + else
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
IIUC nandc_set_read_loc_last() is only needed to read the last codeword which is
handled by the last command in this function:
nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
> read_loc += data_size1;
>
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> + else
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> read_loc += oob_size1;
>
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> + else
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> read_loc += data_size2;
>
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 0);
> + else
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
> }
>
> config_nand_cw_read(nandc, false);
> @@ -1873,14 +1915,27 @@ static int read_page_ecc(struct qcom_nand_host *host, u8 *data_buf,
>
> if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> if (data_buf && oob_buf) {
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, data_size,
> - oob_size, 1);
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && i == (ecc->steps - 1)) {
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
Why do you need this? Can't you use nandc_set_read_loc()? Same for below cases.
Thanks,
Mani
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 1, data_size,
> + oob_size, 1);
> + } else {
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, data_size,
> + oob_size, 1);
> + }
> } else if (data_buf) {
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && i == (ecc->steps - 1))
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
> + else
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
> } else {
> - nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, data_size,
> - oob_size, 1);
> + if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && i == (ecc->steps - 1))
> + nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, data_size,
> + oob_size, 1);
> + else
> + nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, data_size,
> + oob_size, 1);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-31 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-17 14:02 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register Md Sadre Alam
2020-12-31 10:53 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2021-01-04 18:54 ` mdalam
2021-01-05 15:45 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-01-10 3:49 ` mdalam
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-14 21:17 Md Sadre Alam
2021-02-15 8:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-15 19:19 ` mdalam
2021-02-15 19:16 Md Sadre Alam
2021-02-16 8:16 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-16 17:53 ` mdalam
2021-02-18 9:20 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-18 16:29 ` mdalam
2021-02-21 20:27 ` mdalam
2021-02-22 20:04 Md Sadre Alam
2021-02-23 16:34 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-23 19:43 ` mdalam
2021-02-24 4:39 ` mdalam
2021-02-24 6:48 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-24 16:30 ` mdalam
2021-02-24 16:36 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-26 18:25 ` mdalam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201231105303.GI7345@thinkpad \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mdalam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox