From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF11C433E6 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 10:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED712310B for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 10:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727063AbhAFKD7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 05:03:59 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:60010 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726464AbhAFKD6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 05:03:58 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f09690020b9eee96d74c6dd.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f09:6900:20b9:eee9:6d74:c6dd]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id CE4281EC04F0; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 11:03:15 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1609927395; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=iAfpaZseU8rtBfSQH6eBi47GvS0K9Dab1MU6EmvLzI4=; b=czQrmcoO22O7xdC9bFE4W9lPaNRZpf1Z2jpKUXdHJyQbbVDKBJGpJS1to4FH6VjI/6Qy6+ 56XCeScS3+yGMxXTpDcmKoGK4EgczE77stbxqRnJWO446dmnV5ONxt9cP+fdM67fBlkYrQ aVVK2zT/Xvgpdhch6r6/CPCc140lQtU= Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 11:03:13 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Juergen Gross Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , Wei Liu , Deep Shah , "VMware, Inc." , Paolo Bonzini , Sean Christopherson , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Joerg Roedel , Boris Ostrovsky , Stefano Stabellini , Daniel Lezcano , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/15] x86/paravirt: switch time pvops functions to use static_call() Message-ID: <20210106100313.GB5729@zn.tnic> References: <20201217093133.1507-1-jgross@suse.com> <20201217093133.1507-7-jgross@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201217093133.1507-7-jgross@suse.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:31:24AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: > The time pvops functions are the only ones left which might be > used in 32-bit mode and which return a 64-bit value. > > Switch them to use the static_call() mechanism instead of pvops, as > this allows quite some simplification of the pvops implementation. > > Due to include hell this requires to split out the time interfaces > into a new header file. I guess you can add Peter's patch to your set, no? https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201110005609.40989-3-frederic@kernel.org -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette