From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD81EC433E0
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu,  7 Jan 2021 19:05:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DD723435
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu,  7 Jan 2021 19:05:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1729069AbhAGTFh (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 7 Jan 2021 14:05:37 -0500
Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43072 "EHLO
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726600AbhAGTFg (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 7 Jan 2021 14:05:36 -0500
Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2002:c35c:fd02::1])
        by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47F50C0612F4
        for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Thu,  7 Jan 2021 11:04:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux))
        id 1kxaaT-0086YQ-5e; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 19:04:45 +0000
Date:   Thu, 7 Jan 2021 19:04:45 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, lkp@lists.01.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
        Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>, zhengjun.xing@intel.com
Subject: Re: [x86] d55564cfc2: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -5.8% regression
Message-ID: <20210107190445.GK3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20210107134723.GA28532@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
 <CAHk-=wgQ5EEH3-GTK9KDB5mBmWjP25YHXC6_-V_KfWd0UTDTDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20210107183358.GG3579531@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <CAHk-=wiZaFRt9hGen9=eOr7LA+Q8o5f980eGEvtxBD6+os7nqA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wiZaFRt9hGen9=eOr7LA+Q8o5f980eGEvtxBD6+os7nqA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:47:07AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Now, the "whole entry" is just 8 bytes, so it's possible that it would
> actually be faster to do a copy of the whole thing rather than write
> just the 16 bits. But I got very nervous about it, because I could
> easily see some threaded app actually changing the 'fd' (or the
> 'event' field) in place (ie writing -1 to it as they close and re-use
> it)

BTW, changing 'event' field in place from another thread is going to
be interesting - you have two 16bit values next to each other and
two CPUs modifying those with no exclusion.  Sounds like a recipe
for massive trouble...

Or am I missing something here?