From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32ADC433E0 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 23:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB4B22AAC for ; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 23:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726877AbhAJXgS (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:36:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44316 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726068AbhAJXgR (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:36:17 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:3a1::42]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D86BC061786; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 15:35:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from lwn.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F6C337B; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 23:35:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 5F6C337B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1610321736; bh=hZrMjR9W5abuncY6YploYHeQ/mwBGMzjRxDIGuPozRU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=f5H+HXUt6y11QVRkPAopn/5gbwztwaQ5kCRYRXnhh3fq7EAdiedNlgm8K7MHHi76K dlsWNovqmDRL6nUV5uzPn74sNPmmTECV6a90fKwNOkkylLdKQXx0q8m+8vnnBKdcTd O59p+NDdHhXqF+/tYK60IdiSc4P1+Pt65RANjdIUs/Sm53+cGlbSZMb+aQSDs4g+0z SgojpXWqFhTiizUaAWz0+nX6lWoYDNacZAsEXTRgPR5qxW994v0lSZkSkHNg/Ab7EJ L/gVs/+5M0OvCFqZ6V4/s8o+FWW2F2KRLCbRQO8jBuRNRoKW8Y9ypC8CGRDaBbUrvs WHx+MGxLfn03A== Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 16:35:34 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Chao Yu , Jaegeuk Kim , Chao Yu , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the f2fs tree Message-ID: <20210110163534.24481e1e@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20210111073354.6ec0bbb5@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20210107141158.312835d8@canb.auug.org.au> <3f921b3d-e8f2-e010-0f6b-76596e29e997@huawei.com> <20210111073354.6ec0bbb5@canb.auug.org.au> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 07:33:54 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 19:28:19 +0800 Chao Yu wrote: > > > > On 2021/1/7 11:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > After merging the f2fs tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced > > > this warning: > > > > > > Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-fs-f2fs:382: WARNING: Inline emphasis start-string without end-string. > > > > IIUC, should I remove "/*" and "*/" for newly added entry in sysfs-fs-f2fs? > > Sorry, I don't know. Cc'ing Jon. Removing the comment markers would make the warning go away, but won't lead to a satisfactory rendering in HTML. If you want that too, make the table look like the others immediately above it in the same file. Thanks, jon