From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: YANG LI <abaci-bugfix@linux.alibaba.com>,
kdasu.kdev@gmail.com, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: spi-bcm-qspi: style: Simplify bool comparison
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:29:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210111172930.GI4728@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32b6ba61-91a8-ada3-1c8f-0e85d330f27e@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1433 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 09:21:11AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 1/11/21 9:05 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Honestly for super trivial stuff like this I'm not sure it's a useful
> > use of anyone's time to police this sort of stuff aggressively, it's
> > after the prefixes that matter so I saw it easily and I'm having a hard
> > time caring that it happens to be done as a prefix rather than saying
> > style somewhere else in the subject.
> That sounds fair, however it does look like people who submit trivial
> patches are typically the ones that also tend not to follow prior
> commits to the same file, and given the patch is trivial, enforcing a
> consistent subject sort of offsets the less amount of time spent in
> reviewing the patch.
Yeah, I do tend to moan if the commonly used prefixes aren't there but
I tend not to worry about anything after that.
> > I will generally hold off for longer with these trivial patches on
> > things where I expect to see some review but that's felt a bit patchy
> > with the Broadcom drivers.
> OK, we will try to be more reactive then, Kamal is in GMT-0500 and I am
> GMT-0800 so it make take a bit of time for us to get to our review backlog.
To be clear it's more that if there's generally a review of any patch
within say a week or a few days or something then I'll hold off until it
materializes but if it's likely to time out then I'll tend to just go
ahead immediately.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-11 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-11 9:26 [PATCH] spi: spi-bcm-qspi: style: Simplify bool comparison YANG LI
2021-01-11 16:29 ` Mark Brown
2021-01-11 16:41 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-01-11 17:05 ` Mark Brown
2021-01-11 17:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-01-11 17:29 ` Mark Brown [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-11 9:54 YANG LI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210111172930.GI4728@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=abaci-bugfix@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kdasu.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox