From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com>
To: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Ira Weiny" <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Kelley, Sean V" <sean.v.kelley@intel.com>,
Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@jonmasters.org>,
Chris Browy <cbrowy@avery-design.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
<daniel.lll@alibaba-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 03/16] cxl/acpi: add OSC support
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:48:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210112184840.00002195@Huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210111225121.820014-4-ben.widawsky@intel.com>
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 14:51:07 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> From: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
>
> Add support to advertise OS capabilities, and request OS control for CXL
> features using the ACPI _OSC mechanism. Advertise support for all
> possible CXL features, and attempt to request control for all possible
> features.
>
> Based on a patch by Sean Kelley.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Whilst I understand the reasoning behind not just sharing this code with PCI,
it might be worth adding a comment to the code somewhere on that.
Otherwise, I suspect you'll very rapidly see patches cleaning up this duplication :)
Otherwise LGTM.
J
> ---
> Documentation/cxl/memory-devices.rst | 15 ++
> drivers/cxl/acpi.c | 260 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/cxl/acpi.h | 20 +++
> 3 files changed, 292 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/cxl/memory-devices.rst b/Documentation/cxl/memory-devices.rst
> index aa4262280c67..6ce88f9d5f4f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/cxl/memory-devices.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/cxl/memory-devices.rst
> @@ -13,3 +13,18 @@ Driver Infrastructure
> =====================
>
> This sections covers the driver infrastructure for a CXL memory device.
> +
> +ACPI CXL
> +--------
> +
> +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> + :doc: cxl acpi
> +
> +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> + :internal:
> +
> +External Interfaces
> +===================
> +
> +.. kernel-doc:: drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> + :export:
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> index 0f1ba9b3f1ed..af9c0dfdee20 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,258 @@
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include "acpi.h"
>
> -/*
> +/**
> + * DOC: cxl acpi
> + *
> + * ACPI _OSC setup: The exported function cxl_bus_acquire() sets up ACPI
> + * Operating System Capabilities (_OSC) for the CXL bus. It declares support
> + * for all CXL capabilities, and attempts to request control for all possible
> + * capabilities. The resulting support and control sets are saved in global
> + * variables cxl_osc_support_set and cxl_osc_control_set. The internal
> + * functions cxl_osc_declare_support(), and cxl_osc_request_control() can be
> + * used to update the support and control sets in accordance with the ACPI
> + * rules for _OSC evaluation - most importantly, capabilities already granted
> + * should not be rescinded by either the OS or firmware.
> + */
> +
> +static u32 cxl_osc_support_set;
> +static u32 cxl_osc_control_set;
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_desc_lock);
> +
> +struct pci_osc_bit_struct {
> + u32 bit;
> + char *desc;
> +};
> +
> +static struct pci_osc_bit_struct cxl_osc_support_bit[] = {
> + { CXL_OSC_PORT_REG_ACCESS_SUPPORT, "CXLPortRegAccess" },
> + { CXL_OSC_PORT_DEV_REG_ACCESS_SUPPORT, "CXLPortDevRegAccess" },
> + { CXL_OSC_PER_SUPPORT, "CXLProtocolErrorReporting" },
> + { CXL_OSC_NATIVE_HP_SUPPORT, "CXLNativeHotPlug" },
> +};
> +
> +static struct pci_osc_bit_struct cxl_osc_control_bit[] = {
> + { CXL_OSC_MEM_ERROR_CONTROL, "CXLMemErrorReporting" },
> +};
> +
> +static u8 cxl_osc_uuid_str[] = "68F2D50B-C469-4d8A-BD3D-941A103FD3FC";
> +
> +static void decode_osc_bits(struct device *dev, char *msg, u32 word,
> + struct pci_osc_bit_struct *table, int size)
> +{
> + char buf[80];
> + int i, len = 0;
> + struct pci_osc_bit_struct *entry;
> +
> + buf[0] = '\0';
> + for (i = 0, entry = table; i < size; i++, entry++)
> + if (word & entry->bit)
> + len += scnprintf(buf + len, sizeof(buf) - len, "%s%s",
> + len ? " " : "", entry->desc);
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "_OSC: %s [%s]\n", msg, buf);
> +}
> +
> +static void decode_cxl_osc_support(struct device *dev, char *msg, u32 word)
> +{
> + decode_osc_bits(dev, msg, word, cxl_osc_support_bit,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(cxl_osc_support_bit));
> +}
> +
> +static void decode_cxl_osc_control(struct device *dev, char *msg, u32 word)
> +{
> + decode_osc_bits(dev, msg, word, cxl_osc_control_bit,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(cxl_osc_control_bit));
> +}
> +
> +static acpi_status acpi_cap_run_osc(acpi_handle handle, const u32 *capbuf,
> + u8 *uuid_str, u32 *retval)
> +{
> + struct acpi_osc_context context = {
> + .uuid_str = uuid_str,
> + .rev = 1,
> + .cap.length = 20,
> + .cap.pointer = (void *)capbuf,
> + };
> + acpi_status status;
> +
> + status = acpi_run_osc(handle, &context);
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> + /* pointer + offset to DWORD 5 */
> + *retval = *((u32 *)(context.ret.pointer + 16));
> + kfree(context.ret.pointer);
> + }
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> +static acpi_status cxl_query_osc(acpi_handle handle, u32 support, u32 *control)
> +{
> + struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> + acpi_status status;
> + u32 result, capbuf[5];
> +
> + root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
> + if (!root)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + support &= CXL_OSC_SUPPORT_VALID_MASK;
> + support |= cxl_osc_support_set;
> +
> + capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = OSC_QUERY_ENABLE;
> + capbuf[PCI_OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = root->osc_support_set;
> + capbuf[PCI_OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = root->osc_control_set;
> + capbuf[CXL_OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = support;
> + if (control) {
> + *control &= CXL_OSC_CONTROL_VALID_MASK;
> + capbuf[CXL_OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = *control | cxl_osc_control_set;
> + } else {
> + /* Run _OSC query only with existing controls. */
> + capbuf[CXL_OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = cxl_osc_control_set;
> + }
> +
> + status = acpi_cap_run_osc(handle, capbuf, cxl_osc_uuid_str, &result);
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> + cxl_osc_support_set = support;
> + if (control)
> + *control = result;
> + }
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cxl_osc_declare_support - Declare support for CXL root _OSC features.
> + * @handle: ACPI device handle for the PCI root bridge (or PCIe Root Complex).
> + * @flags: The _OSC bits to declare support for.
> + *
> + * The PCI specific DWORDS are obtained from the pci root port device, and
> + * used as-is. The resulting CXL support set is saved in cxl_osc_support_set.
> + * Any future calls to this are forced to be strictly incremental from the
> + * existing cxl_osc_support_set.
> + */
> +static acpi_status cxl_osc_declare_support(acpi_handle handle, u32 flags)
> +{
> + acpi_status status;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&acpi_desc_lock);
> + status = cxl_query_osc(handle, flags, NULL);
> + mutex_unlock(&acpi_desc_lock);
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cxl_osc_request_control - Request control of CXL root _OSC features.
> + * @adev: ACPI device for the PCI root bridge (or PCIe Root Complex).
> + * @mask: Mask of _OSC bits to request control of, place to store control mask.
> + * @req: Mask of _OSC bits the control of is essential to the caller.
> + *
> + * The PCI specific DWORDS are obtained from the pci root port device, and
> + * used as-is. The resulting CXL control set is saved in cxl_osc_control_set.
> + * Any future calls to this are forced to be strictly incremental from the
> + * existing cxl_osc_control_set.
> + */
> +static acpi_status cxl_osc_request_control(struct acpi_device *adev, u32 *mask,
> + u32 req)
> +{
> + acpi_handle handle = adev->handle;
> + struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
> + struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> + acpi_status status = AE_OK;
> + u32 ctrl, capbuf[5];
> +
> + if (!mask)
> + return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
> +
> + ctrl = *mask & CXL_OSC_MEM_ERROR_CONTROL;
> + if ((ctrl & req) != req)
> + return AE_TYPE;
> +
> + root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
> + if (!root)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&acpi_desc_lock);
> +
> + *mask = ctrl | cxl_osc_control_set;
> + /* No need to evaluate _OSC if the control was already granted. */
> + if ((cxl_osc_control_set & ctrl) == ctrl)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* Need to check the available controls bits before requesting them. */
> + while (*mask) {
> + status = cxl_query_osc(handle, cxl_osc_support_set, mask);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + goto out;
> + if (ctrl == *mask)
> + break;
> + decode_cxl_osc_control(dev, "platform does not support",
> + ctrl & ~(*mask));
> + ctrl = *mask;
> + }
> +
> + if ((ctrl & req) != req) {
> + decode_cxl_osc_control(dev,
> + "not requesting control; platform does not support",
> + req & ~(ctrl));
> + status = AE_SUPPORT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = 0;
> + capbuf[PCI_OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = root->osc_support_set;
> + capbuf[PCI_OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = root->osc_control_set;
> + capbuf[CXL_OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = cxl_osc_support_set;
> + capbuf[CXL_OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = ctrl;
> + status = acpi_cap_run_osc(handle, capbuf, cxl_osc_uuid_str, mask);
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> + cxl_osc_control_set = *mask;
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&acpi_desc_lock);
> + return status;
> +}
> +
> +static int cxl_negotiate_osc(struct acpi_device *adev)
> +{
> + u32 cxl_support, cxl_control, requested;
> + acpi_handle handle = adev->handle;
> + struct device *dev = &adev->dev;
> + acpi_status status;
> +
> + /* Declare support for everything */
> + cxl_support = CXL_OSC_SUPPORT_VALID_MASK;
> + decode_cxl_osc_support(dev, "OS supports", cxl_support);
> + status = cxl_osc_declare_support(handle, cxl_support);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> + dev_info(dev, "CXL_OSC failed (%s)\n",
> + acpi_format_exception(status));
> + return -ENXIO;
> + }
> +
> + /* Request control for everything */
> + cxl_control = CXL_OSC_CONTROL_VALID_MASK;
> + requested = cxl_control;
> + status = cxl_osc_request_control(adev, &cxl_control,
> + CXL_OSC_MEM_ERROR_CONTROL);
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> + decode_cxl_osc_control(dev, "OS now controls", cxl_control);
> + } else {
> + decode_cxl_osc_control(dev, "OS requested", requested);
> + decode_cxl_osc_control(dev, "platform willing to grant",
> + cxl_control);
> + dev_info(dev, "_OSC failed (%s)\n",
> + acpi_format_exception(status));
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * cxl_bus_acquire - Perform platform-specific bus operations
> + * @pdev: pci_dev associated with the CXL device
> + *
> + * This performs bus-specific operations such as ACPI _OSC to ensure that
> + * the bus is 'prepared'. Since the CXL definition of _OSC depends on the
> + * existing PCI _OSC DWORDS in 'Arg3', pull those in from the pci root port
> + * device, and merge those into the new CXL-augmented _OSC calls.
> + *
> * If/when CXL support is defined by other platform firmware the kernel
> * will need a mechanism to select between the platform specific version
> * of this routine, until then, hard-code ACPI assumptions
> @@ -21,6 +272,7 @@ int cxl_bus_acquire(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> struct acpi_device *adev;
> struct pci_dev *root_port;
> struct device *root;
> + int rc;
>
> root_port = pcie_find_root_port(pdev);
> if (!root_port)
> @@ -34,9 +286,11 @@ int cxl_bus_acquire(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> if (!adev)
> return -ENXIO;
>
> - /* TODO: OSC enabling */
> + rc = cxl_negotiate_osc(adev);
> + if (rc)
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to negotiate OSC\n");
>
> - return 0;
> + return rc;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cxl_bus_acquire);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/acpi.h b/drivers/cxl/acpi.h
> index d638f8886ab7..6ef154021745 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/acpi.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/acpi.h
> @@ -12,4 +12,24 @@ struct cxl_acpi_desc {
>
> int cxl_bus_acquire(struct pci_dev *pci_dev);
>
> +/* Indexes into _OSC Capabilities Buffer */
> +#define PCI_OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD 1 /* DWORD 2 */
> +#define PCI_OSC_CONTROL_DWORD 2 /* DWORD 3 */
> +#define CXL_OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD 3 /* DWORD 4 */
> +#define CXL_OSC_CONTROL_DWORD 4 /* DWORD 5 */
> +
> +/* CXL Host Bridge _OSC: Capabilities DWORD 4: Support Field */
> +#define CXL_OSC_PORT_REG_ACCESS_SUPPORT 0x00000001
> +#define CXL_OSC_PORT_DEV_REG_ACCESS_SUPPORT 0x00000002
> +#define CXL_OSC_PER_SUPPORT 0x00000004
> +#define CXL_OSC_NATIVE_HP_SUPPORT 0x00000008
> +#define CXL_OSC_SUPPORT_VALID_MASK (CXL_OSC_PORT_REG_ACCESS_SUPPORT | \
> + CXL_OSC_PORT_DEV_REG_ACCESS_SUPPORT | \
> + CXL_OSC_PER_SUPPORT | \
> + CXL_OSC_NATIVE_HP_SUPPORT)
> +
> +/* CXL Host Bridge _OSC: Capabilities DWORD 5: Control Field */
> +#define CXL_OSC_MEM_ERROR_CONTROL 0x00000001
> +#define CXL_OSC_CONTROL_VALID_MASK (CXL_OSC_MEM_ERROR_CONTROL)
> +
> #endif /* __CXL_ACPI_H__ */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-12 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-11 22:51 [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] CXL 2.0 Support Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/16] docs: cxl: Add basic documentation Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/16] cxl/acpi: Add an acpi_cxl module for the CXL interconnect Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 7:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-01-12 18:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-12 19:43 ` Dan Williams
2021-01-12 22:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-13 17:55 ` Kaneda, Erik
2021-01-20 19:27 ` Dan Williams
2021-01-20 19:18 ` Verma, Vishal L
2021-01-13 12:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-20 19:21 ` Verma, Vishal L
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/16] cxl/acpi: add OSC support Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-01-12 18:48 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/16] cxl/mem: Introduce a driver for CXL-2.0-Type-3 endpoints Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 7:08 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-01-12 19:01 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-12 20:06 ` Dan Williams
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] cxl/mem: Map memory device registers Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 19:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-12 19:21 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 20:40 ` Dan Williams
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/16] cxl/mem: Find device capabilities Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 19:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-12 19:22 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/16] cxl/mem: Implement polled mode mailbox Ben Widawsky
2021-01-13 18:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-14 17:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-14 17:50 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 18:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/16] cxl/mem: Register CXL memX devices Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 16:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/16] cxl/mem: Add basic IOCTL interface Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 16:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/16] cxl/mem: Add send command Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 17:10 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-21 18:15 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-22 11:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-22 17:08 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/16] taint: add taint for direct hardware access Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/16] taint: add taint for unfettered " Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 3:31 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/16] cxl/mem: Add a "RAW" send command Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/16] cxl/mem: Create concept of enabled commands Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 17:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-21 18:40 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-22 11:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/16] cxl/mem: Use CEL for enabling commands Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 18:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-14 18:13 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 18:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-14 19:04 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 19:24 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/16] cxl/mem: Add limited Get Log command (0401h) Ben Widawsky
2021-01-14 18:08 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-01-23 0:14 ` Ben Widawsky
2021-01-11 22:51 ` [RFC PATCH v3 16/16] MAINTAINERS: Add maintainers of the CXL driver Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 1:12 ` Joe Perches
[not found] ` <0f2a6d62-09d8-416f-e972-3e9869c3e1a6@alibaba-inc.com>
2021-01-12 15:17 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/16] CXL 2.0 Support Ben Widawsky
2021-01-12 16:19 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210112184840.00002195@Huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
--cc=cbrowy@avery-design.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.lll@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jcm@jonmasters.org \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sean.v.kelley@intel.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox