From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B64BC43381 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E64D23132 for ; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394615AbhASNry (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 08:47:54 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60054 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2394482AbhASNlO (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2021 08:41:14 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83A4B185; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 13:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:40:21 +0100 From: Oscar Salvador To: David Hildenbrand Cc: Anshuman Khandual , linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, hca@linux.ibm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, Vasily Gorbik , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Rutland , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/3] mm/memory_hotplug: Pre-validate the address range with platform Message-ID: <20210119134016.GA23408@linux> References: <1610975582-12646-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 02:33:03PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote: > Minor thing, we should make up our mind if we want to call stuff > internally "memhp_" or "mhp". I prefer the latter, because it is shorter. I would rather use the latter as well. I used that in [1]. MEMHP_MERGE_RESOURCE should be renamed if we agree on that. [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mm/cover/20201217130758.11565-1-osalvador@suse.de/ -- Oscar Salvador SUSE L3