public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Li Aubrey <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu()
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:00:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210120083018.GA14462@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210119112211.3196-6-mgorman@techsingularity.net>

Hello Mel, Peter,

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:22:11AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> 
> Both select_idle_core() and select_idle_cpu() do a loop over the same
> cpumask. Observe that by clearing the already visited CPUs, we can
> fold the iteration and iterate a core at a time.
> 
> All we need to do is remember any non-idle CPU we encountered while
> scanning for an idle core. This way we'll only iterate every CPU once.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 12e08da90024..822851b39b65 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c

[..snip..]


> @@ -6157,18 +6169,31 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int t
>  	}
> 
>  	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
> -		if (!--nr)
> -			return -1;
> -		if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
> -			break;
> +		if (smt) {
> +			i = select_idle_core(p, cpu, cpus, &idle_cpu);
> +			if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
> +				return i;
> +
> +		} else {
> +			if (!--nr)
> +				return -1;
> +			i = __select_idle_cpu(cpu);
> +			if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits) {
> +				idle_cpu = i;
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
>  	}
> 
> -	if (sched_feat(SIS_PROP)) {
> +	if (smt)
> +		set_idle_cores(this, false);

Shouldn't we set_idle_cores(false) only if this was the last idle
core in the LLC ? 

--
Thanks and Regards
gautham.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-20  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-19 11:22 [PATCH v3 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-19 11:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: Remove SIS_AVG_CPU Mel Gorman
2021-01-19 11:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: Move avg_scan_cost calculations under SIS_PROP Mel Gorman
2021-01-19 11:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: Make select_idle_cpu() proportional to cores Mel Gorman
2021-01-19 11:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: Remove select_idle_smt() Mel Gorman
2021-01-19 11:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
2021-01-20  8:30   ` Gautham R Shenoy [this message]
2021-01-20  9:12     ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-20  9:21       ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-20  9:54         ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-20  9:58           ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-20 13:55           ` Gautham R Shenoy
2021-01-19 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Vincent Guittot
2021-01-19 12:02   ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-22  9:30     ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-22 10:14       ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-22 13:22         ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-25  4:29           ` Li, Aubrey
2021-01-25  9:04             ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-25 11:37               ` Li, Aubrey
2021-01-25 11:46                 ` Mel Gorman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-01-15 10:08 [PATCH v2 " Mel Gorman
2021-01-15 10:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
2021-01-18 12:55   ` Li, Aubrey
2021-01-18 14:41     ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 [PATCH 0/5] Scan for an idle sibling in a single pass Mel Gorman
2021-01-11 15:50 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: Merge select_idle_core/cpu() Mel Gorman
2021-01-13 17:03   ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-14  9:35     ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-14 13:25       ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-14 13:53         ` Mel Gorman
2021-01-14 15:44           ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-14 17:18             ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210120083018.GA14462@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox