From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A050EC41518 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 22:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A25206ED for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 22:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732445AbhATWFC (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:05:02 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:42461 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732307AbhATWD1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:03:27 -0500 IronPort-SDR: YpRaqPnH6Awni8J8qGHiJTSMU281t09eGFikBdTC9WDbUe8V/jgRSb4QY0PM9Io0J9o67S5XMg 7AaBJAZBy1aQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9870"; a="158362791" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,362,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="158362791" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Jan 2021 14:02:50 -0800 IronPort-SDR: EYKkP5ZOITRDSV++u72NJfM6ECXa5z9c5+lRxuJyv+pWlkYqSMnDPwB/LizzSCKm8bjjBV7Jd/ vdlZXF/5/TzA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,362,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="351241629" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 260eafd5ecd0) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2021 14:02:47 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 260eafd5ecd0 with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l2LYs-00061Q-Gz; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 22:02:46 +0000 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 06:01:58 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Huaixin Chang Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, bsegall@google.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com, khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com, pauld@redhead.com, peterz@infradead.org Subject: [RFC PATCH] sched/fair: __refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime() can be static Message-ID: <20210120220158.GA48439@379ff2649fda> References: <20210120122715.29493-3-changhuaixin@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210120122715.29493-3-changhuaixin@linux.alibaba.com> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- fair.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 8be4651ae482dc..bf2259494136b0 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -4620,7 +4620,7 @@ static inline u64 sched_cfs_bandwidth_slice(void) * * requires cfs_b->lock */ -void __refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, u64 overrun) +static void __refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, u64 overrun) { u64 refill;