From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321D7C433E0 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4608239EB for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728051AbhAUOW1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:22:27 -0500 Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:49285 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728354AbhAUOTD (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 09:19:03 -0500 Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 10LEI9x2024211; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:18:09 +0100 Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:18:09 +0100 From: Willy Tarreau To: Mark Rutland Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" , valentin.schneider@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] tools/nolibc: fix build issues on aarch64 after unistd cleanup Message-ID: <20210121141809.GC24174@1wt.eu> References: <20210121072031.23777-1-w@1wt.eu> <20210121111117.GA48431@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210121111117.GA48431@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:11:17AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > So FWIW: > > Tested-by: Mark Rutland [arm64] Perfect, thanks! Paul, may I let you copy-paste the tested-by yourself ? If you prefer I'm fine with resending a series to you, I just don't want to needlessly spam you :-) > It would be great if this could be applied soon so that it's possible to > use the rcutorture scripts without applying local hacks. Makes sense. I was wondering, should we mark them for stable ? I don't know if anyone relies on these tests to validate stable kernels in fact. > Willy, thanks for sorting this out, especially so quickly! You're welcome, and thanks to you for the detailed report and explanations. Willy