From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3D4DC433DB for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 22:26:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E4DA23A56 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 22:26:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726865AbhAUW0T (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:26:19 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42298 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726301AbhAUW0G (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:26:06 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1231::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1230C06174A for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:25:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=NG5KS4OdJNBNSHQTFqtR/Lx/ADjpfnKN/uLlnpd58vI=; b=IkF01Boe4Rs4NtRHf3OBJ3d71t H4CD0QdynQd6if3uLsCUWxpZQAm8TFKjZAeirqnhgqb279Eilf+QNiNNYXA7aL07YmapcBSrcLjxb sYBPuJDv5yRcyAVmuBPKp6H35+F6/03X3S4ia/G9rthGjTs37K5aBtjF5O7JJsAzp52bpVa6dKMAK R13ctjP4GmwTwVQAJwJCm+HcjJOwk0uEtpz3cbyONQ0tQ7wIZpG0cT1G/y7l1n8ER06FvczqwQ9Kv 7NFyG3sciaSSYrFW6DiZblqCyuk1lBcDXSB/RWriSbObL9ui9siBNH4zyHQrdjZGJMP/+ZtekBXb7 AV4hf+1A==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l2iOD-0007G8-8D; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 22:25:17 +0000 Received: by worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E164E9841F6; Thu, 21 Jan 2021 23:25:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 23:25:12 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: LKML , Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko , Thomas Gleixner , "Paul E . McKenney" , Ingo Molnar , Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/8] preempt/dynamic: Provide preempt_schedule[_notrace]() static calls Message-ID: <20210121222512.GA21484@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20210118141223.123667-1-frederic@kernel.org> <20210118141223.123667-7-frederic@kernel.org> <20210121215826.GB16371@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210121215826.GB16371@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:58:26PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > I'm thinking the above doesn't build for !PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, given it > relies on the STATIC_CALL unconditionally, but we only define it for > PREEMPT_DYNAMIC: Ooh, I see, x86 cannot get there anymore.