The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] arm64: Improve kernel address detection of __is_lm_address()
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:02:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210125130204.GA4565@C02TD0UTHF1T.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210122155642.23187-2-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>

Hi Vincenzo,

On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 03:56:40PM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> Currently, the __is_lm_address() check just masks out the top 12 bits
> of the address, but if they are 0, it still yields a true result.
> This has as a side effect that virt_addr_valid() returns true even for
> invalid virtual addresses (e.g. 0x0).
> 
> Improve the detection checking that it's actually a kernel address
> starting at PAGE_OFFSET.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>

Looking around, it seems that there are some existing uses of
virt_addr_valid() that expect it to reject addresses outside of the
TTBR1 range. For example, check_mem_type() in drivers/tee/optee/call.c.

Given that, I think we need something that's easy to backport to stable.

This patch itself looks fine, but it's not going to backport very far,
so I suspect we might need to write a preparatory patch that adds an
explicit range check to virt_addr_valid() which can be trivially
backported.

For this patch:

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Thanks,
Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> index 18fce223b67b..99d7e1494aaa 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
> @@ -247,9 +247,11 @@ static inline const void *__tag_set(const void *addr, u8 tag)
>  
>  
>  /*
> - * The linear kernel range starts at the bottom of the virtual address space.
> + * Check whether an arbitrary address is within the linear map, which
> + * lives in the [PAGE_OFFSET, PAGE_END) interval at the bottom of the
> + * kernel's TTBR1 address range.
>   */
> -#define __is_lm_address(addr)	(((u64)(addr) & ~PAGE_OFFSET) < (PAGE_END - PAGE_OFFSET))
> +#define __is_lm_address(addr)	(((u64)(addr) ^ PAGE_OFFSET) < (PAGE_END - PAGE_OFFSET))
>  
>  #define __lm_to_phys(addr)	(((addr) & ~PAGE_OFFSET) + PHYS_OFFSET)
>  #define __kimg_to_phys(addr)	((addr) - kimage_voffset)
> -- 
> 2.30.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-26  6:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-22 15:56 [PATCH v4 0/3] kasan: Fix metadata detection for KASAN_HW_TAGS Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] arm64: Improve kernel address detection of __is_lm_address() Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-25 13:02   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2021-01-25 14:36     ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-25 14:59       ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-25 16:09         ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-25 17:56           ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-26 11:58             ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-26 12:07               ` Catalin Marinas
2021-01-26 12:13                 ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-25 17:38         ` Mark Rutland
2021-01-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] kasan: Add explicit preconditions to kasan_report() Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-22 16:10   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-01-22 15:56 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] kasan: Make addr_has_metadata() return true for valid addresses Vincenzo Frascino
2021-01-22 16:09   ` Andrey Konovalov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210125130204.GA4565@C02TD0UTHF1T.local \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=leonro@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox