From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: smp: remove unused variable
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:40:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210126134057.GH1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210126130240.GA2413@kunai>
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 02:02:40PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> > Those who cause breakage really should be the ones to look at patches
> > that fix their breakage.
>
> Does it mean you want an explicit ack from Thomas or that it should go
> via his tree?
What I'm saying is... don't expect me to always review patches that
are for fixing code that other people have contributed - I wish those
who introduce regressions would stick around and attend to breakage
that they cause, instead of hoping that someone else will do that
for them. It's a reasonable ask.
> > The way patches get applied is if they end up in my patch system... if
> > they don't make it there, they don't get applied.
>
> The patch itself is here:
>
> https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=9047/1
Thanks - I'll get around to it in due course. Since I'm no longer
supported as 32-bit ARM maintainer, I only apply patches once or maybe
twice per kernel release. Quite how long this will be sustainable for,
I've no idea (it depends whether I get any actual paying work, and
how much.)
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-26 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-28 12:01 [PATCH] arm: smp: remove unused variable Wolfram Sang
2021-01-26 10:04 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-01-26 10:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-26 13:02 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-01-26 13:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2021-01-26 13:52 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210126134057.GH1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox