Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/13] af_vsock: rest of SEQPACKET support

[Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 02:13:18PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>This does rest of SOCK_SEQPACKET support:
>1) Adds socket ops for SEQPACKET type.
>2) Allows to create socket with SEQPACKET type.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index 4600c1ec3bb3..bbc3c31085aa 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
> 		new_transport = transport_dgram;
> 		break;
> 	case SOCK_STREAM:
>+	case SOCK_SEQPACKET:
> 		if (vsock_use_local_transport(remote_cid))
> 			new_transport = transport_local;
> 		else if (remote_cid <= VMADDR_CID_HOST || !transport_h2g ||
>@@ -459,6 +460,13 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
> 			new_transport = transport_g2h;
> 		else
> 			new_transport = transport_h2g;
>+
>+		if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) {

I think you must also check that new_transport is not NULL.

>+			if (!new_transport->seqpacket_seq_send_len ||
>+			    !new_transport->seqpacket_seq_get_len ||
>+			    !new_transport->seqpacket_dequeue)
>+				return -ENODEV;

I'm not sure about ENODEV is the better choice in this case, since the 
transport exists, but it doesn't support SOCK_SEQPACKET, so maybe is 
better ESOCKTNOSUPPORT.

>+		}
> 		break;
> 	default:
> 		return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT;
>@@ -684,6 +692,7 @@ static int __vsock_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
>
> 	switch (sk->sk_socket->type) {
> 	case SOCK_STREAM:
>+	case SOCK_SEQPACKET:
> 		spin_lock_bh(&vsock_table_lock);
> 		retval = __vsock_bind_connectible(vsk, addr);
> 		spin_unlock_bh(&vsock_table_lock);
>@@ -1406,6 +1415,12 @@ static int vsock_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
> 	return vsock_connect(sock, addr, addr_len, flags);
> }
>
>+static int vsock_seqpacket_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
>+				   int addr_len, int flags)
>+{
>+	return vsock_connect(sock, addr, addr_len, flags);
>+}
>+
> static int vsock_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags,
> 			bool kern)
> {
>@@ -1633,6 +1648,16 @@ static int vsock_stream_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> 					    optlen);
> }
>
>+static int vsock_seqpacket_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
>+				      int level,
>+				      int optname,
>+				      sockptr_t optval,
>+				      unsigned int optlen)
>+{
>+	return vsock_connectible_setsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval,
>+					    optlen);
>+}
>+
> static int vsock_connectible_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> 					int level, int optname,
> 					char __user *optval,
>@@ -1713,6 +1738,15 @@ static int vsock_stream_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
> 					    optlen);
> }
>
>+static int vsock_seqpacket_getsockopt(struct socket *sock,
>+				      int level, int optname,
>+				      char __user *optval,
>+				      int __user *optlen)
>+{
>+	return vsock_connectible_getsockopt(sock, level, optname, optval,
>+					    optlen);
>+}
>+
> static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 				     size_t len)
> {
>@@ -1870,6 +1904,12 @@ static int vsock_stream_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
> 	return vsock_connectible_sendmsg(sock, msg, len);
> }
>
>+static int vsock_seqpacket_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>+				   size_t len)
>+{
>+	return vsock_connectible_sendmsg(sock, msg, len);
>+}
>+
> static int vsock_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct wait_queue_entry *wait,
> 			   long timeout,
> 			   struct vsock_transport_recv_notify_data *recv_data,
>@@ -2184,6 +2224,13 @@ vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
> 	return vsock_connectible_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
> }
>
>+static int
>+vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
>+			int flags)
>+{
>+	return vsock_connectible_recvmsg(sock, msg, len, flags);
>+}
>+

As I said, I think you don't need to implement all of this helpers and 
you can directly assign the vsock_connectible_* functions in the 
'vsock_seqpacket_ops'.

> static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = {
> 	.family = PF_VSOCK,
> 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>@@ -2205,6 +2252,27 @@ static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = {
> 	.sendpage = sock_no_sendpage,
> };
>
>+static const struct proto_ops vsock_seqpacket_ops = {
>+	.family = PF_VSOCK,
>+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
>+	.release = vsock_release,
>+	.bind = vsock_bind,
>+	.connect = vsock_seqpacket_connect,
>+	.socketpair = sock_no_socketpair,
>+	.accept = vsock_accept,
>+	.getname = vsock_getname,
>+	.poll = vsock_poll,
>+	.ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
>+	.listen = vsock_listen,
>+	.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
>+	.setsockopt = vsock_seqpacket_setsockopt,
>+	.getsockopt = vsock_seqpacket_getsockopt,
>+	.sendmsg = vsock_seqpacket_sendmsg,
>+	.recvmsg = vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg,
>+	.mmap = sock_no_mmap,
>+	.sendpage = sock_no_sendpage,
>+};
>+
> static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
> 			int protocol, int kern)
> {
>@@ -2225,6 +2293,9 @@ static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
> 	case SOCK_STREAM:
> 		sock->ops = &vsock_stream_ops;
> 		break;
>+	case SOCK_SEQPACKET:
>+		sock->ops = &vsock_seqpacket_ops;
>+		break;
> 	default:
> 		return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT;
> 	}
>-- 
>2.25.1
>