From: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
ak@linux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com,
alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v14 03/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Add PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT check when guest LBR is enabled
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 13:10:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210201051039.255478-4-like.xu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201051039.255478-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Usespace could set the bits [0, 5] of the IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES
MSR which tells about the record format stored in the LBR records.
The LBR will be enabled on the guest if host perf supports LBR
(checked via x86_perf_get_lbr()) and the vcpu model is compatible
with the host one.
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 7 +++++++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 11 +++++++++++
4 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
index a58cf3655351..db1178a66d93 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ extern int __read_mostly pt_mode;
#define PT_MODE_HOST_GUEST 1
#define PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES (1ULL << 13)
+#define PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT 0x3f
struct nested_vmx_msrs {
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
index f632039173ff..01b2cd8eca47 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -168,6 +168,21 @@ static inline struct kvm_pmc *get_fw_gp_pmc(struct kvm_pmu *pmu, u32 msr)
return get_gp_pmc(pmu, msr, MSR_IA32_PMC0);
}
+bool intel_pmu_lbr_is_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr = vcpu_to_lbr_records(vcpu);
+
+ /*
+ * As a first step, a guest could only enable LBR feature if its
+ * cpu model is the same as the host because the LBR registers
+ * would be pass-through to the guest and they're model specific.
+ */
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86_model != guest_cpuid_model(vcpu))
+ return false;
+
+ return !x86_perf_get_lbr(lbr);
+}
+
static bool intel_is_valid_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 msr)
{
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
@@ -388,6 +403,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
int i;
struct kvm_pmu *pmu = vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu);
+ struct lbr_desc *lbr_desc = vcpu_to_lbr_desc(vcpu);
for (i = 0; i < INTEL_PMC_MAX_GENERIC; i++) {
pmu->gp_counters[i].type = KVM_PMC_GP;
@@ -404,6 +420,7 @@ static void intel_pmu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
}
vcpu->arch.perf_capabilities = 0;
+ lbr_desc->records.nr = 0;
}
static void intel_pmu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 387adaa1194f..af9c7632ecfa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -2212,6 +2212,13 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES:
if (data && !vcpu_to_pmu(vcpu)->version)
return 1;
+ if (data & PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT) {
+ if ((data & PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT) !=
+ (vmx_get_perf_capabilities() & PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT))
+ return 1;
+ if (!intel_pmu_lbr_is_compatible(vcpu))
+ return 1;
+ }
ret = kvm_set_msr_common(vcpu, msr_info);
break;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
index adc40d36909c..095e357e5316 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -70,6 +70,16 @@ struct pt_desc {
struct pt_ctx guest;
};
+#define vcpu_to_lbr_desc(vcpu) (&to_vmx(vcpu)->lbr_desc)
+#define vcpu_to_lbr_records(vcpu) (&to_vmx(vcpu)->lbr_desc.records)
+
+bool intel_pmu_lbr_is_compatible(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+
+struct lbr_desc {
+ /* Basic info about guest LBR records. */
+ struct x86_pmu_lbr records;
+};
+
/*
* The nested_vmx structure is part of vcpu_vmx, and holds information we need
* for correct emulation of VMX (i.e., nested VMX) on this vcpu.
@@ -279,6 +289,7 @@ struct vcpu_vmx {
u64 ept_pointer;
struct pt_desc pt_desc;
+ struct lbr_desc lbr_desc;
/* Save desired MSR intercept (read: pass-through) state */
#define MAX_POSSIBLE_PASSTHROUGH_MSRS 13
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-01 5:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 5:10 [PATCH v14 00/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Guest Last Branch Recording Enabling Like Xu
2021-02-01 5:10 ` [PATCH v14 01/11] KVM: x86/vmx: Make vmx_set_intercept_for_msr() non-static Like Xu
2021-02-01 5:10 ` [PATCH v14 02/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Set up IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES if PDCM bit is available Like Xu
2021-02-02 11:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-01 5:10 ` Like Xu [this message]
2021-02-02 12:00 ` [PATCH v14 03/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Add PMU_CAP_LBR_FMT check when guest LBR is enabled Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-01 5:10 ` [PATCH v14 04/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Expose DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR in the MSR_IA32_DEBUGCTLMSR Like Xu
2021-02-01 5:10 ` [PATCH v14 05/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Create a guest LBR event when vcpu sets DEBUGCTLMSR_LBR Like Xu
2021-02-01 5:10 ` [PATCH v14 06/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Pass-through LBR msrs when the guest LBR event is ACTIVE Like Xu
2021-02-01 5:10 ` [PATCH v14 07/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Reduce the overhead of LBR pass-through or cancellation Like Xu
2021-02-01 5:10 ` [PATCH v14 08/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate legacy freezing LBRs on virtual PMI Like Xu
2021-02-01 5:10 ` [PATCH v14 09/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Release guest LBR event via lazy release mechanism Like Xu
2021-02-01 5:10 ` [PATCH v14 10/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Expose LBR_FMT in the MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES Like Xu
2021-02-01 5:10 ` [PATCH v14 11/11] selftests: kvm/x86: add test for pmu msr MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES Like Xu
2021-02-01 6:01 ` [PATCH v14 07/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Reduce the overhead of LBR pass-through or cancellation Like Xu
2021-02-01 6:01 ` [PATCH v14 08/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate legacy freezing LBRs on virtual PMI Like Xu
2021-02-01 6:01 ` [PATCH v14 09/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Release guest LBR event via lazy release mechanism Like Xu
2021-02-01 6:01 ` [PATCH v14 10/11] KVM: vmx/pmu: Expose LBR_FMT in the MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES Like Xu
2021-02-01 6:01 ` [PATCH v14 11/11] selftests: kvm/x86: add test for pmu msr MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES Like Xu
2021-02-02 14:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-02-02 12:37 ` [PATCH v14 00/11] KVM: x86/pmu: Guest Last Branch Recording Enabling Paolo Bonzini
2021-07-29 12:40 ` Liuxiangdong
2021-07-30 3:15 ` Liuxiangdong
2021-07-30 3:28 ` Like Xu
2022-09-13 23:42 ` Jim Mattson
2022-09-19 7:26 ` Like Xu
2022-09-19 18:08 ` Jim Mattson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210201051039.255478-4-like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--to=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox