From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [patch 04/12] x86/apic: Split out spurious handling code
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 21:49:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204211154.513658079@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210204204903.350275743@linutronix.de
sysvec_spurious_apic_interrupt() calls into the handling body of
__spurious_interrupt() which is not obvious as that function is declared
inside the DEFINE_IDTENTRY_IRQ(spurious_interrupt) macro.
As __spurious_interrupt() is currently always inlined this ends up with two
copies of the same code for no reason.
Split the handling function out and invoke it from both entry points.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -2133,18 +2133,11 @@ void __init register_lapic_address(unsig
* Local APIC interrupts
*/
-/**
- * spurious_interrupt - Catch all for interrupts raised on unused vectors
- * @regs: Pointer to pt_regs on stack
- * @vector: The vector number
- *
- * This is invoked from ASM entry code to catch all interrupts which
- * trigger on an entry which is routed to the common_spurious idtentry
- * point.
- *
- * Also called from sysvec_spurious_apic_interrupt().
+/*
+ * Common handling code for spurious_interrupt and spurious_vector entry
+ * points below. No point in allowing the compiler to inline it twice.
*/
-DEFINE_IDTENTRY_IRQ(spurious_interrupt)
+static noinline void handle_spurious_interrupt(u8 vector)
{
u32 v;
@@ -2179,9 +2172,23 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_IRQ(spurious_interrupt)
trace_spurious_apic_exit(vector);
}
+/**
+ * spurious_interrupt - Catch all for interrupts raised on unused vectors
+ * @regs: Pointer to pt_regs on stack
+ * @vector: The vector number
+ *
+ * This is invoked from ASM entry code to catch all interrupts which
+ * trigger on an entry which is routed to the common_spurious idtentry
+ * point.
+ */
+DEFINE_IDTENTRY_IRQ(spurious_interrupt)
+{
+ handle_spurious_interrupt(vector);
+}
+
DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(sysvec_spurious_apic_interrupt)
{
- __spurious_interrupt(regs, SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR);
+ handle_spurious_interrupt(SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR);
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-05 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-04 20:49 [patch 00/12] x86/irq/64: Inline irq stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 01/12] x86/entry: Fix instrumentation annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 12:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 02/12] x86/irq: Sanitize irq stack tracking Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 03/12] x86/irq/64: Adjust the per CPU irq stack pointer by 8 Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 13:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-05 15:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 05/12] x86/irq: Provide macro for inlining irq stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-08 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-08 20:42 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-02-09 15:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-09 16:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-02-09 18:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 06/12] x86/entry: Convert system vectors to irq stack macro Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 3:52 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-05 14:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-07 8:15 ` [kbuild-all] " Rong Chen
2021-02-08 14:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-09 8:57 ` Rong Chen
2021-02-09 10:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 07/12] x86/entry: Convert device interrupts to inline stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 08/12] x86/entry: Use run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond() for XEN upcall Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 7:28 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 09/12] x86/softirq: Remove indirection in do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 10/12] x86: Select CONFIG_HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 11/12] softirq: Allow inlining do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 10:14 ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-02-05 11:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-09 20:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 12/12] x86/softirq/64: Inline do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-08 21:47 ` [patch 00/12] x86/irq/64: Inline irq stack switching Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210204211154.513658079@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox