From: "Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries" <jorge@foundries.io>
To: "Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries" <jorge@foundries.io>
Cc: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] optee: simplify i2c access
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 09:32:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210208083250.GB27508@trex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210208074631.GA27508@trex>
On 08/02/21, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries wrote:
> On 08/02/21, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> > Hi Jorge,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 11:41 AM Jens Wiklander
> > <jens.wiklander@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Arnd,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:38 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > >
> > > > Storing a bogus i2c_client structure on the stack adds overhead and
> > > > causes a compile-time warning:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c:493:6: error: stack frame size of 1056 bytes in function 'optee_handle_rpc' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > > > void optee_handle_rpc(struct tee_context *ctx, struct optee_rpc_param *param,
> > > >
> > > > Change the implementation of handle_rpc_func_cmd_i2c_transfer() to
> > > > open-code the i2c_transfer() call, which makes it easier to read
> > > > and avoids the warning.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: c05210ab9757 ("drivers: optee: allow op-tee to access devices on the i2c bus")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> > > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Looks good to me.
> > > Reviewed-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
> >
> > Would you mind testing this?
>
> sure, doing it this morning.
>
> btw what Arnd has done - removing the unnecessary level of indirection
> - was pretty much my initial though but I thought it was easier to
> read the way I wrote it (I guess I was wrong and I obviously missed
> the stack size increase)
>
> but yes, will test
Tested on imx6ull.
Tested-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge@foundries.io>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jens
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-25 11:37 [PATCH] optee: simplify i2c access Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-26 8:08 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2021-01-26 9:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-26 11:45 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2021-01-26 14:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-27 10:41 ` Jens Wiklander
2021-02-08 7:00 ` Jens Wiklander
2021-02-08 7:46 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
2021-02-08 8:32 ` Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries [this message]
2021-02-08 8:54 ` Jens Wiklander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210208083250.GB27508@trex \
--to=jorge@foundries.io \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox