From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2 v3] tracepoints: Remove unnecessary "data_args" macro parameter
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 15:09:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210208201050.768074128@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210208200922.215867530@goodmis.org
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
While working on a clean up that would restructure the difference between
architectures that have static calls vs those that do not, I was stumbling
over the "data_args" parameter that includes "__data" in the arguments. The
issue was that one version didn't even need it, while the other one did.
Instead of injecting a "__data = NULL;" into the macro for the unneeded
version, just remove it completely.
The original idea behind data_args is that there may be a case of a
tracepoint with no arguments. But this is considered bad practice, and all
tracepoints should pass something to that location (that's what tracepoints
were created for).
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
include/linux/tracepoint.h | 31 +++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/tracepoint.h b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
index 966ed8980327..42bb5b753b33 100644
--- a/include/linux/tracepoint.h
+++ b/include/linux/tracepoint.h
@@ -160,13 +160,8 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
/*
* it_func[0] is never NULL because there is at least one element in the array
* when the array itself is non NULL.
- *
- * Note, the proto and args passed in includes "__data" as the first parameter.
- * The reason for this is to handle the "void" prototype. If a tracepoint
- * has a "void" prototype, then it is invalid to declare a function
- * as "(void *, void)".
*/
-#define __DO_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, rcuidle) \
+#define __DO_TRACE(name, args, cond, rcuidle) \
do { \
struct tracepoint_func *it_func_ptr; \
int __maybe_unused __idx = 0; \
@@ -194,7 +189,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
rcu_dereference_raw((&__tracepoint_##name)->funcs); \
if (it_func_ptr) { \
__data = (it_func_ptr)->data; \
- __DO_TRACE_CALL(name)(args); \
+ __DO_TRACE_CALL(name)(__data, args); \
} \
\
if (rcuidle) { \
@@ -206,17 +201,16 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
} while (0)
#ifndef MODULE
-#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
+#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond) \
static inline void trace_##name##_rcuidle(proto) \
{ \
if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) \
__DO_TRACE(name, \
- TP_PROTO(data_proto), \
- TP_ARGS(data_args), \
+ TP_ARGS(args), \
TP_CONDITION(cond), 1); \
}
#else
-#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args)
+#define __DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, proto, args, cond)
#endif
/*
@@ -231,7 +225,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
* even when this tracepoint is off. This code has no purpose other than
* poking RCU a bit.
*/
-#define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
+#define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto) \
extern int __traceiter_##name(data_proto); \
DECLARE_STATIC_CALL(tp_func_##name, __traceiter_##name); \
extern struct tracepoint __tracepoint_##name; \
@@ -239,8 +233,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
{ \
if (static_key_false(&__tracepoint_##name.key)) \
__DO_TRACE(name, \
- TP_PROTO(data_proto), \
- TP_ARGS(data_args), \
+ TP_ARGS(args), \
TP_CONDITION(cond), 0); \
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LOCKDEP) && (cond)) { \
rcu_read_lock_sched_notrace(); \
@@ -249,7 +242,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
} \
} \
__DECLARE_TRACE_RCU(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
- PARAMS(cond), PARAMS(data_proto), PARAMS(data_args)) \
+ PARAMS(cond)) \
static inline int \
register_trace_##name(void (*probe)(data_proto), void *data) \
{ \
@@ -332,7 +325,7 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
#else /* !TRACEPOINTS_ENABLED */
-#define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto, data_args) \
+#define __DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args, cond, data_proto) \
static inline void trace_##name(proto) \
{ } \
static inline void trace_##name##_rcuidle(proto) \
@@ -412,14 +405,12 @@ static inline struct tracepoint *tracepoint_ptr_deref(tracepoint_ptr_t *p)
#define DECLARE_TRACE(name, proto, args) \
__DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
cpu_online(raw_smp_processor_id()), \
- PARAMS(void *__data, proto), \
- PARAMS(__data, args))
+ PARAMS(void *__data, proto))
#define DECLARE_TRACE_CONDITION(name, proto, args, cond) \
__DECLARE_TRACE(name, PARAMS(proto), PARAMS(args), \
cpu_online(raw_smp_processor_id()) && (PARAMS(cond)), \
- PARAMS(void *__data, proto), \
- PARAMS(__data, args))
+ PARAMS(void *__data, proto))
#define TRACE_EVENT_FLAGS(event, flag)
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-08 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 20:09 [PATCH 0/2 v3] tracepoints: Stop punishing non-static call users Steven Rostedt
2021-02-08 20:09 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2021-02-08 20:09 ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] tracepoints: Do not punish non static " Steven Rostedt
2021-02-09 11:59 ` [PATCH 0/2 v3] tracepoints: Stop punishing non-static " Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-09 14:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210208201050.768074128@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox