From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] perf core: Factor out __perf_sw_event_sched
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:33:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210210083327.22726-1-namhyung@kernel.org> (raw)
In some cases, we need to check more than whether the software event
is enabled. So split the condition check and the actual event
handling. This is a preparation for the next change.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 33 ++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index fab42cfbd350..2a1be6026a2f 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -1174,30 +1174,24 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct pt_regs, __perf_regs[4]);
* which is guaranteed by us not actually scheduling inside other swevents
* because those disable preemption.
*/
-static __always_inline void
-perf_sw_event_sched(u32 event_id, u64 nr, u64 addr)
+static __always_inline void __perf_sw_event_sched(u32 event_id, u64 nr, u64 addr)
{
- if (static_key_false(&perf_swevent_enabled[event_id])) {
- struct pt_regs *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&__perf_regs[0]);
+ struct pt_regs *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&__perf_regs[0]);
- perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
- ___perf_sw_event(event_id, nr, regs, addr);
- }
+ perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
+ ___perf_sw_event(event_id, nr, regs, addr);
}
extern struct static_key_false perf_sched_events;
-static __always_inline bool
-perf_sw_migrate_enabled(void)
+static __always_inline bool __perf_sw_enabled(int swevt)
{
- if (static_key_false(&perf_swevent_enabled[PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS]))
- return true;
- return false;
+ return static_key_false(&perf_swevent_enabled[swevt]);
}
static inline void perf_event_task_migrate(struct task_struct *task)
{
- if (perf_sw_migrate_enabled())
+ if (__perf_sw_enabled(PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS))
task->sched_migrated = 1;
}
@@ -1207,11 +1201,9 @@ static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
if (static_branch_unlikely(&perf_sched_events))
__perf_event_task_sched_in(prev, task);
- if (perf_sw_migrate_enabled() && task->sched_migrated) {
- struct pt_regs *regs = this_cpu_ptr(&__perf_regs[0]);
-
- perf_fetch_caller_regs(regs);
- ___perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS, 1, regs, 0);
+ if (__perf_sw_enabled(PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS) &&
+ task->sched_migrated) {
+ __perf_sw_event_sched(PERF_COUNT_SW_CPU_MIGRATIONS, 1, 0);
task->sched_migrated = 0;
}
}
@@ -1219,7 +1211,8 @@ static inline void perf_event_task_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
static inline void perf_event_task_sched_out(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *next)
{
- perf_sw_event_sched(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES, 1, 0);
+ if (__perf_sw_enabled(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES))
+ __perf_sw_event_sched(PERF_COUNT_SW_CONTEXT_SWITCHES, 1, 0);
if (static_branch_unlikely(&perf_sched_events))
__perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
@@ -1475,8 +1468,6 @@ static inline int perf_event_refresh(struct perf_event *event, int refresh)
static inline void
perf_sw_event(u32 event_id, u64 nr, struct pt_regs *regs, u64 addr) { }
static inline void
-perf_sw_event_sched(u32 event_id, u64 nr, u64 addr) { }
-static inline void
perf_bp_event(struct perf_event *event, void *data) { }
static inline int perf_register_guest_info_callbacks
--
2.30.0.478.g8a0d178c01-goog
next reply other threads:[~2021-02-10 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-10 8:33 Namhyung Kim [this message]
2021-02-10 8:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] perf core: Add PERF_COUNT_SW_CGROUP_SWITCHES event Namhyung Kim
2021-04-16 15:01 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim
2021-04-16 17:13 ` tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim
2021-02-10 8:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] perf tools: Add 'cgroup-switches' software event Namhyung Kim
2021-04-19 18:02 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-05-06 5:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-05-19 17:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-25 9:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] perf core: Factor out __perf_sw_event_sched Stephane Eranian
2021-04-16 15:01 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim
2021-04-16 17:13 ` tip-bot2 for Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210210083327.22726-1-namhyung@kernel.org \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox