From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6F8C433E6 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D1464E76 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232236AbhBJQX2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:23:28 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f169.google.com ([209.85.167.169]:38930 "EHLO mail-oi1-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232009AbhBJQXJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:23:09 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f169.google.com with SMTP id l19so2617880oih.6; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:22:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=vth8XAW3OyURtmhNnatsP5/LHcdSP/3zZ/uHnRpXRKc=; b=N1ih5ssccjZOrnw1UX0F8wx3gDGtho+L/26PE+dcF0ItVf7ihxR9VkrXcZegkhnWiW 4PIWStQ6HLZP9a84pbtFhgbBQMljBQZd4eVRQeY10kQ7YAoPvQXhYdywBhLVklq4AP3h E6zYexHHFFpZAxtCnJPnyOGe5fbdpJsw+wg9NQ0uzjchJ9E5kxQ+98Rxpu9nvPRvhOh9 +RnC4XogLT5F+fp1Apn4PANeE7IQb0IUvFwLVaIc8mK9ygAtITpeMG3HKqGrYhyPSHxn PezeG9ctofwhOgPZ+dOLvetK5BF8PcaIKBMK1phzubDtAx8wJDUfYhBeKvvKaFGbMWUY 04dQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533b0TF2kldped3rj3ZubMv5WqFve2Bt+33zgGsFYval0mk9llbl XeyVSCup9EcvBaCLbW/ITA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfxK7JznCTG1mpjgRDFFLjV0SKpKj+NHymT0VWGOpHsKTkHtAJz+FjiiuPdSHMH+x9xBnSjg== X-Received: by 2002:aca:3746:: with SMTP id e67mr2563353oia.68.1612974148441; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:22:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w2sm469998otq.9.2021.02.10.08.22.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 2263747 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:22:26 -0000 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:22:26 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Alexandre Belloni , a.fatoum@pengutronix.de, Saravana Kannan , Tudor Ambarus , Stephen Boyd , LKML , Michael Turquette , linux-clk , Krzysztof Kozlowski , mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, Ludovic Desroches , Codrin.Ciubotariu@microchip.com, Claudiu Beznea , linux-arm-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: Fix the declaration of the clocks Message-ID: <20210210162226.GA2246688@robh.at.kernel.org> References: <20210203154332.470587-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com> <5bc4f5b7-5370-bdd5-143e-429c83447ce1@microchip.com> <161291845517.418021.17378265940034341908@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:00:14AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:51:14AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Saravana, > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:57 AM Saravana Kannan wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:54 PM Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > Quoting Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com (2021-02-08 01:49:45) > > > > > Do you plan to take this patch for v5.12? > > > > > If fw_devlink will remain set to ON for v5.12, some of our boards will > > > > > no longer boot without this patch. > > > > > > > > Is fw_devlink defaulted to on for v5.12? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > Have all issues been identified and understood? > > Have all issues been fixed, reviewed, and committed? > > Have all fixes entered linux-next? > > Have all fixes been migrated from submaintainers to maintainers? This can never be true for these types of per platform issues. There are folks that test linux-next Then there are ones that test rc1. And (unfortunately) so-on ending at testing only LTS releases. > > We're already at v5.11-rc7. > > Yes, we can get fixes into v5.12-rc7. Or v5.12-rc9... > > Yeah, I'm leaning toward not making it the default for 5.12-rc1 because > not everything seems to be working, let's see how the rest of the week > goes... I think there's some value waiting until after rc1 to turn off if just to find a few more issues. Rob