From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895D0C433DB for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3F264E30 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231245AbhBKLo5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:44:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54884 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231145AbhBKLPY (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:15:24 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67A7BC061574 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 03:14:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f094f007c127c6ae8522aa3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f09:4f00:7c12:7c6a:e852:2aa3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 988B91EC0445; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:14:28 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1613042068; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=QE7u08u7dLz7Vbz2fekrYrl+HcX5ZE5gTFobJJDANLA=; b=IBeLvHzZYx3wz308cV7WwqKv1J218RjvYuJYsHK7hVA2it3JsJZkF15UTlxwC1bVqTkBK0 Dl+EXlP088X77Tx02FcSwY9x0Pzp7anAvYW0OzY8pKrx5c8iPhf4yzQsgJS0daT6DqO6HR pDI4+vXneNirJlexKgoUWNW8Bz0MguY= Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:14:26 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: kernel test robot Cc: x86-ml , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] BUILD SUCCESS WITH WARNING c46f52231e79af025e2c89e889d69ec20a4c024f Message-ID: <20210211111426.GB21330@zn.tnic> References: <60250afb.uuto1B/nlljRhghR%lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <60250afb.uuto1B/nlljRhghR%lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 06:46:19PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86/mm > branch HEAD: c46f52231e79af025e2c89e889d69ec20a4c024f x86/{fault,efi}: Fix and rename efi_recover_from_page_fault() > > possible Warning in current branch: > > arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c:736 efi_crash_gracefully_on_page_fault() warn: ignoring unreachable code. > > Warning ids grouped by kconfigs: > > gcc_recent_errors > `-- x86_64-randconfig-m001-20210211 > `-- arch-x86-platform-efi-quirks.c-efi_crash_gracefully_on_page_fault()-warn:ignoring-unreachable-code. Very useful bug report. And I had already asked you guys to explain how one can reproduce this. So I'm going to ignore it for now. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette