public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: mdalam@codeaurora.org
Cc: richard@nod.at, boris.brezillon@collabora.com, mani@kernel.org,
	krzk@kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sricharan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:20:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210218102019.44973727@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6f21a0cc139546c6351eb4e195dd43bd@codeaurora.org>

Hello,

> >> >> +/* helper to configure location register values */  
> >> +static void nandc_set_read_loc(struct nand_chip *chip, int cw, int >> reg,
> >> +			       int offset, int size, int is_last)  
> > 
> > You know cw, you have access to chip->ecc.steps, so you can derive by
> > yourself if is_last is set or not. No need to forward it through
> > function calls.  
> 
> 
>    This "is_last" is not for last code word, it will indicate the Location register "NAND_READ_LOCATION_n" last bit.

Ok, I've mixed two things. Let's keep this boolean as it is for now and
just do the minimum changes to support the LOCATION_LAST_cw registers.

Nevertheless, can't you calculate is_last from nandc_set_read_loc() ?

I also think a bit of renaming (in a different patch) would be welcome
to avoid such confusions.

Just to be clear: I think you should take a step back, and try to
simplify a bit this driver. I understand you know every character by
heart but with an external eye it's not that easy to understand what
you want to do and why:
- write small commits with a single, atomic change
- try to reduce the number of parameters when it is possible
- try to use meaningful names (is_last vs. LAST_CW)
- try to avoid extra indentation level when possible


[...]

> >> @@ -1094,11 +1144,19 @@ static void
config_nand_page_read(struct
>> qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
> >>   * before reading each codeword in NAND page.
> >>   */
> >>  static void
> >> -config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
> >> +config_nand_cw_read(struct nand_chip *chip, bool use_ecc, int cw)
> >>  {
> >> -	if (nandc->props->is_bam)
> >> -		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
> >> -			      NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> >> +	struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc = get_qcom_nand_controller(chip);
> >> +	struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
> >> +
> >> +	if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
> >> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
> >> +			write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0, 4,
> >> +				      NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> >> +		else
> >> +			write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
> >> +				      NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> >> +	}  
> > 
> > Same here, I am pretty sure we can abstract the complexity.
> >   
>     Here I did this because , i need pointer to struct nand_ecc_ctrl structure
>     to access ecc->steps for CW comparison for last code word. cw == (ecc->steps - 1)
> 
>     So i think no separate patch needed for conversion of nanc-->chip.
>     Please let me know if still separate patch needed for nanc-->chip conversion.

I was talking about the extra indentation level.

the "qpic_v2 && cv == ..." condition can be checked by write_reg_dma
directly.

You could even introduce a helper returning the boolean value of which
register should be used.

Regarding the use of nand_chip instead of nandc, if there are too many
changes involved, I prefer a separate patch.

> 
> >> >>  	write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);  
> >>  	write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
> >> @@ -1117,11 +1175,11 @@ config_nand_cw_read(struct >> qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
> >>   * single codeword in page
> >>   */
> >>  static void
> >> -config_nand_single_cw_page_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc,
> >> -				bool use_ecc)
> >> +config_nand_single_cw_page_read(struct nand_chip *chip,
> >> +				bool use_ecc, int cw)
> >>  {
> >> -	config_nand_page_read(nandc);
> >> -	config_nand_cw_read(nandc, use_ecc);
> >> +	config_nand_page_read(chip);
> >> +	config_nand_cw_read(chip, use_ecc, cw);
> >>  }  
> >> >>  /*  
> >> @@ -1205,7 +1263,7 @@ static int nandc_param(struct qcom_nand_host >> *host)
> >>  		nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD_RESTORE, nandc->vld);
> >>  	}  
> >> >> -	nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, 512, 1);  
> >> +	nandc_set_read_loc(chip, 0, 0, 0, 512, 1);  
> >> >>  	if (!nandc->props->qpic_v2) {  
> >>  		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD, 1, 0);
> >> @@ -1215,7 +1273,7 @@ static int nandc_param(struct qcom_nand_host >> *host)
> >>  	nandc->buf_count = 512;
> >>  	memset(nandc->data_buffer, 0xff, nandc->buf_count);  
> >> >> -	config_nand_single_cw_page_read(nandc, false);  
> >> +	config_nand_single_cw_page_read(chip, false, 0);  
> >> >>  	read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, nandc->data_buffer,  
> >>  		      nandc->buf_count, 0);
> >> @@ -1617,7 +1675,7 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, >> struct nand_chip *chip,
> >>  	clear_bam_transaction(nandc);
> >>  	set_address(host, host->cw_size * cw, page);
> >>  	update_rw_regs(host, 1, true);
> >> -	config_nand_page_read(nandc);
> >> +	config_nand_page_read(chip);  
> >> >>  	data_size1 = mtd->writesize - host->cw_size * (ecc->steps - 1);  
> >>  	oob_size1 = host->bbm_size;
> >> @@ -1633,19 +1691,19 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, >> struct nand_chip *chip,
> >>  	}  
> >> >>  	if (nandc->props->is_bam) {  
> >> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> >> +		nandc_set_read_loc(chip, cw, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
> >>  		read_loc += data_size1;  
> >> >> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);  
> >> +		nandc_set_read_loc(chip, cw, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
> >>  		read_loc += oob_size1;  
> >> >> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);  
> >> +		nandc_set_read_loc(chip, cw, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
> >>  		read_loc += data_size2;  
> >> >> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);  
> >> +		nandc_set_read_loc(chip, cw, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
> >>  	}  
> >> >> -	config_nand_cw_read(nandc, false);  
> >> +	config_nand_cw_read(chip, false, cw);  
> >> >>  	read_data_dma(nandc, reg_off, data_buf, data_size1, 0);  
> >>  	reg_off += data_size1;
> >> @@ -1856,7 +1914,7 @@ static int read_page_ecc(struct qcom_nand_host >> *host, u8 *data_buf,
> >>  	u8 *data_buf_start = data_buf, *oob_buf_start = oob_buf;
> >>  	int i, ret;  
> >> >> -	config_nand_page_read(nandc);  
> >> +	config_nand_page_read(chip);  
> >> >>  	/* queue cmd descs for each codeword */  
> >>  	for (i = 0; i < ecc->steps; i++) {
> >> @@ -1873,18 +1931,16 @@ static int read_page_ecc(struct qcom_nand_host >> *host, u8 *data_buf,  
> >> >>  		if (nandc->props->is_bam) {  
> >>  			if (data_buf && oob_buf) {
> >> -				nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
> >> -				nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, data_size,
> >> -						   oob_size, 1);
> >> +				nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
> >> +				nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 1, data_size, oob_size, 1);
> >>  			} else if (data_buf) {
> >> -				nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
> >> +				nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
> >>  			} else {
> >> -				nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, data_size,
> >> -						   oob_size, 1);
> >> +				nandc_set_read_loc(chip, i, 0, data_size, oob_size, 1);
> >>  			}
> >>  		}  
> >> >> -		config_nand_cw_read(nandc, true);  
> >> +		config_nand_cw_read(chip, true, i);  
> >> >>  		if (data_buf)  
> >>  			read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, data_buf,
> >> @@ -1946,7 +2002,7 @@ static int copy_last_cw(struct qcom_nand_host >> *host, int page)
> >>  	set_address(host, host->cw_size * (ecc->steps - 1), page);
> >>  	update_rw_regs(host, 1, true);  
> >> >> -	config_nand_single_cw_page_read(nandc, host->use_ecc);  
> >> +	config_nand_single_cw_page_read(chip, host->use_ecc, ecc->steps - >> 1);  
> >> >>  	read_data_dma(nandc, FLASH_BUF_ACC, nandc->data_buffer, size, 0);
> >> > > Thanks,  
> > Miquèl  

Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-18 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-15 19:16 [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register Md Sadre Alam
2021-02-16  8:16 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-16 17:53   ` mdalam
2021-02-18  9:20     ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2021-02-18 16:29       ` mdalam
2021-02-21 20:27         ` mdalam
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-02-22 20:04 Md Sadre Alam
2021-02-23 16:34 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-23 19:43   ` mdalam
2021-02-24  4:39     ` mdalam
2021-02-24  6:48       ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-24 16:30         ` mdalam
2021-02-24 16:36           ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-26 18:25             ` mdalam
2021-02-14 21:17 Md Sadre Alam
2021-02-15  8:40 ` Miquel Raynal
2021-02-15 19:19   ` mdalam
2020-12-17 14:02 Md Sadre Alam
2020-12-31 10:53 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-01-04 18:54   ` mdalam
2021-01-05 15:45     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2021-01-10  3:49       ` mdalam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210218102019.44973727@xps13 \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=mdalam@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sricharan@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox