From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437CCC433E0 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CDE64EF2 for ; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230024AbhBUOh5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2021 09:37:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36026 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229999AbhBUOhy (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Feb 2021 09:37:54 -0500 Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:2f7::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0D0FC061574; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 06:37:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 7CFB228E5; Sun, 21 Feb 2021 09:37:12 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 fieldses.org 7CFB228E5 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fieldses.org; s=default; t=1613918232; bh=Q0gnwv2t4NZsEC7k5ibkWa5MYZGFMGKdh3cOh4PXWJ8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=vmmiIdXpVc38B39drEy7+CfrDKlMzrhsPw0lKWzTCJbFkKCqnUlHOwIWAz/ol6J6L 7Set20VbLn82On8qh6/QfKPeTTRywcVCfr/bvPkJ4h+wEjc9TxaB7tL2QmBzr8Uv1e 4QvPwPbN4B4DdfXdzAJark17xbQQM9DegYBcAlU8= Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 09:37:12 -0500 From: Bruce Fields To: Anton Ivanov Cc: Salvatore Bonaccorso , Chuck Lever , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "940821@bugs.debian.org" <940821@bugs.debian.org>, Linux NFS Mailing List , trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna.schumaker@netapp.com Subject: Re: NFS Caching broken in 4.19.37 Message-ID: <20210221143712.GA15975@fieldses.org> References: <5022bdc4-9f3e-9756-cbca-ada37f88ecc7@cambridgegreys.com> <9305dc03-5557-5e18-e5c9-aaf886a03fff@cambridgegreys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9305dc03-5557-5e18-e5c9-aaf886a03fff@cambridgegreys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 11:38:51AM +0000, Anton Ivanov wrote: > On 21/02/2021 09:13, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > >On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:16:26PM +0000, Chuck Lever wrote: > >>Confirming you are varying client-side kernels. Should the Linux > >>NFS client maintainers be Cc'd? > > > >Ok, agreed. Let's add them as well. NFS client maintainers any ideas > >on how to trackle this? > > This is not observed with Debian backports 5.10 package > > uname -a > Linux madding 5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1 > (2021-02-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux I'm still unclear: when you say you tested a certain kernel: are you varying the client-side kernel version, or the server side, or both at once? --b.