Re: [PATCH 1/5] powercap/drivers/dtpm: Encapsulate even more the code

Lukasz Luba
2021-03-08T19:56:02Z

Hi Daniel,

On 3/8/21 7:31 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> On 01/03/2021 22:21, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> In order to increase the self-encapsulation of the dtpm generic code,
>> the following changes are adding a power update ops to the dtpm
>> ops. That allows the generic code to call directly the dtpm backend
>> function to update the power values.
>>
>> The power update function does compute the power characteristics when
>> the function is invoked. In the case of the CPUs, the power
>> consumption depends on the number of online CPUs. The online CPUs mask
>> is not up to date at CPUHP_AP_ONLINE_DYN state in the tear down
>> callback. That is the reason why the online / offline are at separate
>> state. As there is already an existing state for DTPM, this one is
>> only moved to the DEAD state, so there is no addition of new state
>> with these changes.
>>
>> That simplifies the code for the next changes and results in a more
>> self-encapsulated code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>
> Is there any comment on this series ?

If you can wait 1 day, I will review it tomorrow...
I was quite busy recently and put it at the end of my list.

Regards,
Lukasz