From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911CBC433E0 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 08:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6816464F07 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 08:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236403AbhCDIOX (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2021 03:14:23 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:40865 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234006AbhCDIOL (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2021 03:14:11 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B527D68B05; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:13:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:13:29 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Art Nikpal Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: using deprecated initrd support, will be removed in 2021 Message-ID: <20210304081329.GA12996@lst.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 05:18:05PM +0800, Art Nikpal wrote: > hello Christoph > i have see your patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/7/14/1508 > /* using deprecated initrd support, will be removed in 2021*/ > > How can I clarify the situation ?! > > im using squashfs as ramdisk / all system works as all in ram kernel + > initrd (squashfs) > and i think it's very useful - how can we replace it ? With a simple initramfs, you should be able to chose the same compression algorithms as you do for squashfs right now and generate a better image. > and another question: why need to remove it - if it works fine ? It causes a fair amount of maintainance burden in the kernel, and also is less efficient for the user.