From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0AFC433E0 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 05:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1648651D1 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 05:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234397AbhCHFWg (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 00:22:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51848 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234377AbhCHFWS (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 00:22:18 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-x32b.google.com (mail-ot1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C76F7C06174A for ; Sun, 7 Mar 2021 21:22:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ot1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id t16so8069609ott.3 for ; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 21:22:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rfkP+RUBC/I5TihxB9dtySzi9ltoQb0x3qn6GVvaR/w=; b=Ejb8pOslvl56wuvJOKDmLjU14IIQBlenT4w1dk85WLaRKr82GSMOTstLgdC5HUtJpW SKhaBcSEllDbRpgs0sPDY511HQu6XQ3GANeJclNF83pbmNRaAkha+SeiEOEfj30iMeYV to4cax8gozbuj/4UV+thu3Fa18YXcs8WCqUxeSjaVsmTLMqBYQ44PDgRVqdAV/PHmv4a Eb4l9oOGGlaFWM6d3H943Iz2uNXGCyKH0iZ9fJa0dGYpGihBa+UrmBVFvGU6LNjsDRZp /9v2aQOeQ0N/NcImh55+XWFcDy4IK+uI990krioykZVSSWtT/igqWI1+u0yiQOUfHRiv JEIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rfkP+RUBC/I5TihxB9dtySzi9ltoQb0x3qn6GVvaR/w=; b=Jndj/1kLI4smicJjEPaSYhvmmuYUt1kAXv6/WSJAjpcGdeIMd7yW4w0FNQnGtDLIFW mYAQ5l7hxP5Dmmy13rI0EYIl/G0+S+WhqcpM8CBl+HYrpbhomL2JZ3XlFqx4fKhCVY5k Q8czWa9XJop5cJmU/El/6NtYO5x2PYi0akEJK7KBet6GVaa4h+6Vdm/FG9fK4af1iNdn kYoi5Wevm7UQVcx0bK426hVFznG9F20dlqFxf4m2iMA/pePaTq/Uyh7oSGGkBWlvA/GP HTHj0NqtAWScU+J1r8zmD1CF9g2H5lQIRP3/jfcOoMMxVUaqEDlptxdHrHLLvgbFeuaG Jn/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PukI4BppNyVZ2va3TLVCqlqCIA2M7ljiy653YJklQb1Yg4FYY 7lT0BJk/m/n7amRK+Uth8igeLZR3hEs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydbu3dKG3UxgHGRDTOT5Lc6Zl669C2qObnlmBunK35CSyfd3QQsQFm6bvwCRFrHweLgRoeag== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:139a:: with SMTP id d26mr4890092otq.256.1615180935123; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 21:22:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a7sm2198352oon.8.2021.03.07.21.22.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 07 Mar 2021 21:22:14 -0800 (PST) Sender: Guenter Roeck Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 21:22:13 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux 5.12-rc2 Message-ID: <20210308052213.GA201328@roeck-us.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:54:10PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Ok, so this is a couple of days early, but rc1 had the nasty swapfile > issue, so I'm just accelerating rc2 a bit. > > Outside of the swapfile IO offset fix, the only other thing that > stands out is some io_uring thread handling re-organization, which not > only solved a few fundamental issues, but actually made the code > smaller and simpler too. > > Other than that it all looks pretty normal: drivers dominate (with > sound being most notable, with the ASoC Intel SOF support being split > up sanely). But there's some btrfs work, kvm, iscsi, etc. A few random > things all over. > > Shortlog appended for your viewing pleasure, and I sincerely hope (and > believe) that rc2 is in a lot better shape than rc1 was. > At least it survives my tests. Build results: total: 151 pass: 151 fail: 0 Qemu test results: total: 435 pass: 435 fail: 0 Guenter