From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Caleb Connolly <caleb@connolly.tech>
Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
ejb@linux.ibm.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com, cang@codeaurora.org,
beanhuo@micron.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org, asutoshd@codeaurora.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi: ufshcd: switch to a version macro
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:00:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210308080013.GE983@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210308005739.1998483-2-caleb@connolly.tech>
This looks like a really nice improvement!
A bunch of comments below:
> @@ -696,10 +685,21 @@ static inline u32 ufshcd_get_intr_mask(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> */
> static inline u32 ufshcd_get_ufs_version(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
> + u32 ufshci_ver;
missing eempty line after the declaration.
> if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_UFS_HCI_VERSION)
> + ufshci_ver = ufshcd_vops_get_ufs_hci_version(hba);
> + else
> + ufshci_ver = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_VERSION);
>
> + /*
> + * UFSHCI v1.x uses a different version scheme, in order
> + * to allow the use of comparisons with the UFSHCI_VER
> + * macro, we convert it to the same scheme as ufs 2.0+.
> + */
> + if (ufshci_ver & 0x00010000)
> + ufshci_ver = UFSHCI_VER(1, ufshci_ver & 0x00000100);
> +
> + return ufshci_ver;
I'd use early returns here to clean this up a bit:
if (hba->quirks & UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_UFS_HCI_VERSION)
ufshci_ver = ufshcd_vops_get_ufs_hci_version(hba);
...
ufshci_ver = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_VERSION);
if (ufshci_ver & 0x00010000)
return UFSHCI_VER(1, ufshci_ver & 0x00000100);
return ufshci_ver;
> +#define UFSHCI_VER(major, minor) \
> + ((major << 8) + (minor << 4))
This needs braces around major and minor. Or better just convert it
to an inline function (and use a lower case name).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-08 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-08 0:58 scsi: ufshcd: use a macro for UFS versions Caleb Connolly
2021-03-08 0:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi: ufshcd: switch to a version macro Caleb Connolly
2021-03-08 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2021-03-08 10:42 ` Caleb Connolly
2021-03-09 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-03-08 0:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi: ufs: qcom: use UFSHCI_VER macro Caleb Connolly
2021-03-08 0:59 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi: ufshcd: remove version check Caleb Connolly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210308080013.GE983@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=caleb@connolly.tech \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox