From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D002C433DB for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3E665208 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229938AbhCHJCN (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 04:02:13 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42214 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229551AbhCHJBo (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2021 04:01:44 -0500 Received: from mail-wm1-x336.google.com (mail-wm1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::336]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C838FC06174A for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2021 01:01:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x336.google.com with SMTP id f22-20020a7bc8d60000b029010c024a1407so3306337wml.2 for ; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 01:01:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=MUaH7+fr5vYVOb9hsqFBaWwMCQH5+tHHSDiOUUhLamc=; b=QJaLoZ8d9LOLKJTQLV6D9acDSJDuvg7olRz0pvRYF5GXK6I8kgTthkCcex6G5Omj0p DuQXi0RDWDojkKX3Qy8CJfyyVCcTvfSw++94ohX2saG2oxzYsfD5RSgp/5m1kiNQEvam PhC0NNBC796PWDISX0Nos/3E8/YXAAbkRSBPA4BKO28pbu1xO9JxcUhLYDFla4qThRC0 nWPQMZ1qgbnmGV0Ny/VIQ3AGUmU9BiqglHvtxXHu5Cj66+ZnprSYcNnd/EuPR9WhMxmm GPkVzcnHzJzUQWJ711jMKKI0rBLiwVqdt3mpN7Na2Rjs7MPhs2dm0lngbMO8Jx00C34Z dnrw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to; bh=MUaH7+fr5vYVOb9hsqFBaWwMCQH5+tHHSDiOUUhLamc=; b=WeklzccMBkx/RrcEBtjDyn7A0SyQqhi/sYxA69bIpmDa3SUsTdvGGDhkt/5G5FLzP/ ncgAev4xXn1s0dh1RiXBuNnVtuV13ADCLhhl+cW4WxNBVaxFVVuKGjMLYww3WCWJtJey 42iQ3+mOtGUThYUZrUR5jSDpIkZtLeUGeeHVrYjTQKi3yqWSTq9bzSiLISa4utP9C+VZ yhMvytFGf3ZxLuNxtu4iWQFF0oBtPdSjhJ39P15KkK6C9T99xU8LwE8usN63vca9zEVN PsaBxNKx0IyfkRZzh+1cSsfsSAsMD0j4ZHgDaPIavFux8YUurk6430ZhreS6fSM4i3go kJ0A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322Q2MwR9fxH7TabU3LdW/ET79SrNw3Tx1JIX6g/RuvClmCr012 PWlpONnLTtWb7OenCwDfAAe1rQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyFZrtFhtFuOYvUfQcTY5j5EJfCFALswDW1ZlVQUOcNFYFOJ88E8/oirRiM1lLro33elITSsQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:cc14:: with SMTP id h20mr20932255wmb.14.1615194102495; Mon, 08 Mar 2021 01:01:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell ([91.110.221.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x25sm18433888wmj.14.2021.03.08.01.01.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Mar 2021 01:01:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 09:01:24 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Xu Yilun Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, trix@redhat.com, matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com, russell.h.weight@intel.com, lgoncalv@redhat.com, hao.wu@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Some improvement for Intel MAX 10 MFD drivers Message-ID: <20210308090124.GA4931@dell> References: <1614578385-26955-1-git-send-email-yilun.xu@intel.com> <20210308020454.GA32151@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20210308020454.GA32151@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 08 Mar 2021, Xu Yilun wrote: > Hi Lee: > > Could you please help on review this patchset? They are some > improvements for intel-m10-bmc MFD driver. Please don't send contentless pings 1 week after submitting a set. Also please refrain from top-posting. This patch is on my TO-REVIEW list. Unfortunately, since I work in reverse chronological order, you just pushed the set to the back of the list. If after a suitable period, usually around 2 weeks, you think your submission has been missed, please submit a [RESEND] instead. > On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 01:59:41PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote: > > This patchset is some improvements for intel-m10-bmc and its subdevs. > > > > Main changes from v1: > > - Add a patch (#2) to simplify the definition of the legacy version reg. > > - Add a patch (#4), add entry in MAINTAINERS for intel-m10-bmc mfd driver > > and the subdev drivers. > > > > Main changes from v2: > > - Add Tom Rix as the reviewer for intel-m10-bmc mfd driver and the subdev > > drivers. > > - Rebased to 5.12-rc1 > > > > > > Matthew Gerlach (1): > > mfd: intel-m10-bmc: Add access table configuration to the regmap > > > > Xu Yilun (3): > > mfd: intel-m10-bmc: Fix the register access range > > mfd: intel-m10-bmc: Simplify the legacy version reg definition > > MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Intel MAX 10 mfd driver > > > > MAINTAINERS | 10 ++++++++++ > > drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++------- > > include/linux/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.h | 7 +++++-- > > 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog