From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Ti Zhou <x2019cwm@stfx.ca>, Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 02/10] tick/nohz: Add tick_nohz_full_this_cpu()
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:37:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210311123708.23501-3-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311123708.23501-1-frederic@kernel.org>
Optimize further the check for local full dynticks CPU. Testing directly
tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()) is suboptimal because the
compiler first fetches the CPU number and only then processes the
static key.
It's best to evaluate the static branch before anything. Provide with a
function that handles that correctly and convert some users along.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
include/linux/tick.h | 11 ++++++++++-
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 12 +++++-------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index 7340613c7eff..bfc96cbe955c 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -193,6 +193,14 @@ static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu)
return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask);
}
+static inline bool tick_nohz_full_this_cpu(void)
+{
+ if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+ return false;
+
+ return cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), tick_nohz_full_mask);
+}
+
static inline void tick_nohz_full_add_cpus_to(struct cpumask *mask)
{
if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
@@ -271,6 +279,7 @@ extern void __init tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask);
#else
static inline bool tick_nohz_full_enabled(void) { return false; }
static inline bool tick_nohz_full_cpu(int cpu) { return false; }
+static inline bool tick_nohz_full_this_cpu(void) { return false; }
static inline void tick_nohz_full_add_cpus_to(struct cpumask *mask) { }
static inline void tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(int cpu, enum tick_dep_bits bit) { }
@@ -296,7 +305,7 @@ static inline void tick_nohz_full_setup(cpumask_var_t cpumask) { }
static inline void tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
{
- if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+ if (tick_nohz_full_this_cpu())
__tick_nohz_task_switch();
}
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 22b6a46818cf..af76cfa51b57 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct irq_work, nohz_full_kick_work) =
*/
static void tick_nohz_full_kick(void)
{
- if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
+ if (!tick_nohz_full_this_cpu())
return;
irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&nohz_full_kick_work));
@@ -452,9 +452,6 @@ void __tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
local_irq_save(flags);
- if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()))
- goto out;
-
ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
if (ts->tick_stopped) {
@@ -462,7 +459,6 @@ void __tick_nohz_task_switch(void)
atomic_read(¤t->signal->tick_dep_mask))
tick_nohz_full_kick();
}
-out:
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
@@ -929,14 +925,16 @@ static void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
static void tick_nohz_full_update_tick(struct tick_sched *ts)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
- int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ int cpu;
- if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
+ if (!tick_nohz_full_this_cpu())
return;
if (!ts->tick_stopped && ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE)
return;
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
if (can_stop_full_tick(cpu, ts))
tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(ts, cpu);
else if (ts->tick_stopped)
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-11 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 12:36 [PATCH 00/10] tick/nohz updates Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] tick/nohz: Prevent tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() from returning negative value Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 12:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-16 13:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 14:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-16 14:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 15:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-16 15:57 ` 回复: " Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-16 16:08 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-16 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-17 21:49 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-25 13:14 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-25 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-25 19:18 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-25 19:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-25 20:37 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-26 17:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-26 17:53 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-26 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-26 22:53 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-29 12:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-29 14:49 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-11 12:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2021-03-16 12:28 ` [PATCH 02/10] tick/nohz: Add tick_nohz_full_this_cpu() Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-16 13:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 03/10] tick/nohz: Conditionally restart tick on idle exit Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 04/10] tick/nohz: Remove superflous check for CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 05/10] tick/nohz: Update idle_exittime on actual idle exit Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 06/10] timer: Report ignored local enqueue in nohz mode Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-25 13:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 07/10] tick/nohz: Update nohz_full Kconfig help Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 08/10] tick/nohz: Only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 09/10] tick/nohz: Change signal tick dependency to wakeup CPUs of member tasks Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 10/10] tick/nohz: Kick only _queued_ task whose tick dependency is updated Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210311123708.23501-3-frederic@kernel.org \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x2019cwm@stfx.ca \
--cc=yeyunfeng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox