public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Ti Zhou <x2019cwm@stfx.ca>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] tick/nohz: Conditionally restart tick on idle exit
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:37:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210311123708.23501-4-frederic@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311123708.23501-1-frederic@kernel.org>

From: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>

In nohz_full mode, switching from idle to a task will unconditionally
issue a tick restart. If the task is alone in the runqueue or is the
highest priority, the tick will fire once then eventually stop. But that
alone is still undesired noise.

Therefore, only restart the tick on idle exit when it's strictly
necessary.

Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye <yeyunfeng@huawei.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index af76cfa51b57..77dc8cd61dc8 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -922,26 +922,30 @@ static void tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
 	tick_nohz_restart(ts, now);
 }
 
-static void tick_nohz_full_update_tick(struct tick_sched *ts)
+static void __tick_nohz_full_update_tick(struct tick_sched *ts,
+					 ktime_t now)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
-	int cpu;
-
-	if (!tick_nohz_full_this_cpu())
-		return;
-
-	if (!ts->tick_stopped && ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE)
-		return;
-
-	cpu = smp_processor_id();
+	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
 	if (can_stop_full_tick(cpu, ts))
 		tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(ts, cpu);
 	else if (ts->tick_stopped)
-		tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(ts, ktime_get());
+		tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(ts, now);
 #endif
 }
 
+static void tick_nohz_full_update_tick(struct tick_sched *ts)
+{
+	if (!tick_nohz_full_this_cpu())
+		return;
+
+	if (!ts->tick_stopped && ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_INACTIVE)
+		return;
+
+	__tick_nohz_full_update_tick(ts, ktime_get());
+}
+
 static bool can_stop_idle_tick(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
 {
 	/*
@@ -1209,18 +1213,24 @@ static void tick_nohz_account_idle_ticks(struct tick_sched *ts)
 #endif
 }
 
-static void __tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
-{
-	tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(ts, now);
-	tick_nohz_account_idle_ticks(ts);
-}
-
 void tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick(void)
 {
 	struct tick_sched *ts = this_cpu_ptr(&tick_cpu_sched);
 
-	if (ts->tick_stopped)
-		__tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick(ts, ktime_get());
+	if (ts->tick_stopped) {
+		tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(ts, ktime_get());
+		tick_nohz_account_idle_ticks(ts);
+	}
+}
+
+static void tick_nohz_idle_update_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, ktime_t now)
+{
+	if (tick_nohz_full_this_cpu())
+		__tick_nohz_full_update_tick(ts, now);
+	else
+		tick_nohz_restart_sched_tick(ts, now);
+
+	tick_nohz_account_idle_ticks(ts);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1252,7 +1262,7 @@ void tick_nohz_idle_exit(void)
 		tick_nohz_stop_idle(ts, now);
 
 	if (tick_stopped)
-		__tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick(ts, now);
+		tick_nohz_idle_update_tick(ts, now);
 
 	local_irq_enable();
 }
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-11 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-11 12:36 [PATCH 00/10] tick/nohz updates Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:36 ` [PATCH 01/10] tick/nohz: Prevent tick_nohz_get_sleep_length() from returning negative value Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 12:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-16 13:37     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 14:35       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-16 14:53         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 15:26           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-16 15:57             ` 回复: " Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-16 16:08               ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-16 16:25                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-17 21:49                   ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-25 13:14                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-25 18:56                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-25 19:18                     ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-25 19:50                       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-25 20:37                         ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-26 17:01                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-26 17:53                             ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-26 18:54                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-26 22:53                                 ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-29 12:44                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-29 14:49                                     ` Zhou Ti (x2019cwm)
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 02/10] tick/nohz: Add tick_nohz_full_this_cpu() Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 12:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-16 13:05     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 04/10] tick/nohz: Remove superflous check for CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_NATIVE Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 05/10] tick/nohz: Update idle_exittime on actual idle exit Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 06/10] timer: Report ignored local enqueue in nohz mode Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-16 15:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-25 13:07     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 07/10] tick/nohz: Update nohz_full Kconfig help Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 08/10] tick/nohz: Only wakeup a single target cpu when kicking a task Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 09/10] tick/nohz: Change signal tick dependency to wakeup CPUs of member tasks Frederic Weisbecker
2021-03-11 12:37 ` [PATCH 10/10] tick/nohz: Kick only _queued_ task whose tick dependency is updated Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210311123708.23501-4-frederic@kernel.org \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x2019cwm@stfx.ca \
    --cc=yeyunfeng@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox