From: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com,
Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf stat: Align CSV output for summary mode
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 15:29:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210316072900.1739-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> (raw)
perf-stat has supported the summary mode. But the summary
lines break the CSV output so it's hard for scripts to parse
the result.
Before:
# perf stat -x, -I1000 --interval-count 1 --summary
1.001323097,8013.48,msec,cpu-clock,8013483384,100.00,8.013,CPUs utilized
1.001323097,270,,context-switches,8013513297,100.00,0.034,K/sec
1.001323097,13,,cpu-migrations,8013530032,100.00,0.002,K/sec
1.001323097,184,,page-faults,8013546992,100.00,0.023,K/sec
1.001323097,20574191,,cycles,8013551506,100.00,0.003,GHz
1.001323097,10562267,,instructions,8013564958,100.00,0.51,insn per cycle
1.001323097,2019244,,branches,8013575673,100.00,0.252,M/sec
1.001323097,106152,,branch-misses,8013585776,100.00,5.26,of all branches
8013.48,msec,cpu-clock,8013483384,100.00,7.984,CPUs utilized
270,,context-switches,8013513297,100.00,0.034,K/sec
13,,cpu-migrations,8013530032,100.00,0.002,K/sec
184,,page-faults,8013546992,100.00,0.023,K/sec
20574191,,cycles,8013551506,100.00,0.003,GHz
10562267,,instructions,8013564958,100.00,0.51,insn per cycle
2019244,,branches,8013575673,100.00,0.252,M/sec
106152,,branch-misses,8013585776,100.00,5.26,of all branches
The summary line loses the timestamp column, which breaks the
CVS output.
We add a column at the 'timestamp' position and it just says 'summary'
for the summary line.
After:
# perf stat -x, -I1000 --interval-count 1 --summary
1.001196053,8012.72,msec,cpu-clock,8012722903,100.00,8.013,CPUs utilized
1.001196053,218,,context-switches,8012753271,100.00,0.027,K/sec
1.001196053,9,,cpu-migrations,8012769767,100.00,0.001,K/sec
1.001196053,0,,page-faults,8012786257,100.00,0.000,K/sec
1.001196053,15004518,,cycles,8012790637,100.00,0.002,GHz
1.001196053,7954691,,instructions,8012804027,100.00,0.53,insn per cycle
1.001196053,1590259,,branches,8012814766,100.00,0.198,M/sec
1.001196053,82601,,branch-misses,8012824365,100.00,5.19,of all branches
summary,8012.72,msec,cpu-clock,8012722903,100.00,7.986,CPUs utilized
summary,218,,context-switches,8012753271,100.00,0.027,K/sec
summary,9,,cpu-migrations,8012769767,100.00,0.001,K/sec
summary,0,,page-faults,8012786257,100.00,0.000,K/sec
summary,15004518,,cycles,8012790637,100.00,0.002,GHz
summary,7954691,,instructions,8012804027,100.00,0.53,insn per cycle
summary,1590259,,branches,8012814766,100.00,0.198,M/sec
summary,82601,,branch-misses,8012824365,100.00,5.19,of all branches
Now it's easy for script to analyse the summary lines.
Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
---
tools/perf/util/stat-display.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
index 7f09cdaf5b60..c4183d3e87a4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-display.c
@@ -439,6 +439,10 @@ static void printout(struct perf_stat_config *config, struct aggr_cpu_id id, int
if (counter->cgrp)
os.nfields++;
}
+
+ if (config->csv_output && config->summary && !config->interval)
+ fprintf(config->output, "%16s%s", "summary", config->csv_sep);
+
if (run == 0 || ena == 0 || counter->counts->scaled == -1) {
if (config->metric_only) {
pm(config, &os, NULL, "", "", 0);
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-16 7:29 Jin Yao [this message]
2021-03-16 13:07 ` [PATCH] perf stat: Align CSV output for summary mode Jiri Olsa
2021-03-16 13:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-03-16 16:34 ` Andi Kleen
2021-03-16 19:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-03-16 20:02 ` Andi Kleen
2021-03-16 21:55 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-03-17 0:51 ` Jin, Yao
2021-03-17 1:30 ` Andi Kleen
2021-03-17 1:39 ` Jin, Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210316072900.1739-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox